Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17378

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17380

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We have 112 acres on greenbelt. The original house is from 1815 with an addition. We have been trying to build a single house to move to the farm so our parents can stay there. The town will not let us build. We have had the land since the 50s. The arguments to keep the ban in place are not valid. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17385

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I would like to see Bill 66 passed. We need employment lands brought on stream so that Ontario can attract businesses to the Province to provide good jobs for the people. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17387

Commentaire fait au nom

Ingersoll District Nature Club

Statut du commentaire

RE: 013-4293 Bill 66: Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act, 2018; 013-4125 Proposed open-for-business planning tool; 013-4239 New Regulation under the Planning Act for open-for-business planning tool Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17388

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hold the Line, Smart Growth Waterloo Region, and the Waterloo Federation of Agriculture are calling on the councils of the Region of Waterloo and area municipalities to pass resolutions to reaffirm their commitment to smart growth and meaningful public consultations, and to reject the use of Bill 66 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17389

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Having lived next to the protected Green Belt most of my life, I understand the importance of restricting development and preserving it's greenspace. This bill is absolutely unacceptable.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17395

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Doug Ford why do you want to turn Toronto into Chicago and Ontario into Illinois. Having lived there I can attest to the blight and poverty that these types of policy amendments will result in. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17398

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The regulations that Bill 66 wants to cut are not unnecessary. They help protect Ontarians, and the environment me depend on. We can't afford to lose any more green space. Opening up the Greenbelt to rampant development would not help Ontarians.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17400

Commentaire fait au nom

Mark L. Dorfman, Planner Inc.

Statut du commentaire

I have reflected on Schedule 10 of Bill 66. These comments are based on my experience as a Registered Professional Planner in Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17422

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I'm outraged that Schedule 10 of the proposed Bill 66 would allow municipalities to bypass existing protections and legislation that I feel are critical to a healthy province. Here is an excerpt from the bill: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17423

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act. Protected should mean “PROTECTED.”

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17424

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Ontario has a rich history of occupation that dates back more than 12,000 years. The archaeological assessments completed each year in advance of development help fill in the gaps in the story of our Province, Indigenous Peoples and more recent settlers. Archaeology gives a voice to many who have Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17428

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am concerned about Bill 66. There are too many parts to this Bill to allow proper review and debate in the time allowed. It should be separated into a series of smaller bills. Each of the regulations mentioned and identified for repeal or modification was put in place for good reasons. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17431

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66 should not allow the changes proposed in the Long Term Care Act. They will endanger resident safety. It should also not allow municipalities to circumvent environmental and other protections, especially of the Greenbelt by allowing development. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

17432

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is disconcerting that the government wishes to: “Reduce where operating engineers are required to supervise.” Or, In layman’s terms – eliminate OE jobs in Ontario. This is rather ironic, this being part of a “jobs creation” initiative. Lire davantage