Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18244

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Schedule 10 from Bill 66, allowing municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act — is unacceptable and must be removed. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18245

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not want the greenbelt replaced by factories and subdivisions. Please keep the existing environmental protections in place.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18246

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I respectfully ask you to remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18247

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support bill 66's uses of protected green spaces, green belt, watershed or conservation areas as uses for retail, residential or otherwise. They should be left as they are. Let nature be. Concrete structures don't absorb co2, or release oxygen into the atmosphere. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18248

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We do not support Bill 66. Leave the Greenbelt alone. Most of these amendments do not make sense, and should be voted against. Protect our land for agriculture and water!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18249

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66. This bill will affect 5 acts relating to the protection of the environment. Now that Mr. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18251

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a born and raised, current resident of Ontario, I recognize the value in protecting the Greenbelt of Ontario as well as many conservation efforts. I truly believe it is part of our identity as Canadians. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18253

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18254

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Leave the Greenbelt alone. Surely there must be other places for subdivisions and condos and gravel pits to locate that don’t impact on our water supply.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18256

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Firstly, it is undemocratic and terribly controlling to include so many schedules in one Bill. It needs to be broken up into 3 or 4 Bills. Currently it is an attempt to dominate, fool and cheat the populace. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18257

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I'm submitting this comment to voice my opposition to Bill 66. My biggest opposition to the Bill is related to the inclusion of the proposed Schedule 10 of the plan, particularly the 'proposed open-for-business planning tool'. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18258

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Greenbelt should not be changed to allow development. This is a very important area for animal habitat and should not be interfered with. We all need green spaces. We do not need more parking lots and monster homes.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18260

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act.”

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18261

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Schedule 10 should be removed from bill 66. Development of the green belts is not the same as streamlining business development in Ontario. The green belts were designed to be permanent, and to outlive the changes of provincial government. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18262

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I was born and raised still residing in the Fonthill area. When I went to school we learned the Fonthill kame has some of the best soil in Ontario for fruit farming. I will go out of my way to purchase the produce we grow here. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18263

Commentaire fait au nom

Sharbot Lake Property Owners' Association

Statut du commentaire

Dear Premier Ford; I am writing on behalf of the 200+ members of a property owners’ association in eastern Ontario to voice our opposition to Schedule 10 of the government’s proposed Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act (Bill 66). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18268

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

“Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act.”

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18269

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18271

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am 100% against Bill 66. I don’t want the Greenbelt - home to 5,500 farms, 78 species at risk and 102 million tonnes of carbon storage - carved up with factories and subdivisions just so that weathly individuals and business can get even wealthier.