Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18655

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I request that you remove schedule 10 from bill 66. Municipalities must not have the right to override the laws that protect the green belt and our clean water. Remember Walkerton! Provincial oversight is necessary.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18656

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Omnibus bills like this one worry me. Diverse subjects with wide-ranging impacts lumped together as if they all carry the same weight. They are designed to obscure comment not invite intelligent, fact-based discussion and decision-making. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18658

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Ontario needs the Greenbelt. Our people, flora and fauna depend on it for our very survival. Not today, nor tomorrow, but in the years to come. Without nature to sustain us, we will be no more. And all the money made be the corporations will not same them, or us. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18659

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Business and Industry should not have priority over the environment. The Greenbelt should remain protected, our lakes and our water supply should also be maintained and protected. The honourable premier has no right to threaten the envionrmental health of Ontario and the safety of Ontario’s water. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18661

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Our greenspaces provide us with a lot of necessities,including oxygen provided by trees,fresh air away from polluted cities,recreational spaces for families,relaxation,which is also good for continuing health,scenery pleasing to the eye,places for heart-healthy walks,and more.......why would we want Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18662

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It amazes me how some people including politicians who are supposed to act in a balanced way that is good for the people of this country can discount the importance of the environment. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18663

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not want the Greenbelt opened to development. I do not want Schedule 10 at all. Bill 66 is a classless power grab by Ford and Ford alone, in order to enrich his friends at the expense of every citizen of Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18664

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

When it comes to the environment we need to start realizing it’s a matter of public health. Schedule 5 shouldn’t be on this bill. If anything we need to improve not cut.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18665

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Did anyone think this through? These provisions exist for a REASON. Enjoy your power now, because with initiatives like this, it won’t last.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18666

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Greenbelt is so important. It absorbs carbon dioxide which is crucial in our stand against climate change. It helps with tourism and mental health. It purifies the air and water and contains land with the nutrients for agriculture. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18667

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act.”

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18668

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I don't have links and attachments to support my key points. Please take a look around... human growth and development is invading world wide We need to protect our lakes, rivers, streams... grasslands... there are fragile eco-systems at risk Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18670

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

“Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act.”

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18671

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Remove section 10 from this proposed bill. The Greenbelt area must not be compromised. Do not allow development in this protected area.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18674

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As an Ontario resident and voter, I am strongly opposed to Bill 66, which will weaken protections for the environment, and in some cases remove them entirely. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18675

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I dont think the conservative govt should have the Greenbelt to be divided into subdivisions or industrialized. We need more green spaces not less.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18676

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please protect Ontario's most beautiful and productive land in the Greenbelt. It does not need to "be open for business". Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18677

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

For the last many years, we have been happy to know that the green belt around the GTA is safe. We had no idea that a government can simply change the law in order to have businesses invade this precious space. Lire davantage