Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92206

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Ontario does not need more urban sprawl, loss of farmland, destruction of wetlands or ecologically-sensitive areas. Please follow experts who have said that there is sufficient area for development within existing urban boundaries. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92207

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I appreciate the editing that contributes to a more comprehensible document and share the following recommendations. 1. Please retain an intensification-first, efficient, environmentally-sensitive approach to planning. Specifically: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92208

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am absolutely opposed to this. I am ashamed to say that I am living in a province which has such a blatant disregard for protected green space and the environment. At what point do we say enough is enough? When forest fires make it dangerous to go outside and breath? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92209

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We need to stop expanding the boundaries of cities and focus on intensification instead! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92210

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

A significant number of rural farm owners support farm residential lot severances. Rural lot severances on marginal farmland have the ability to increase Ontario’s housing supply without large grants or subsidies from taxpayers from any level of government. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92211

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This development is irresponsible! Why would you ever build houses near a steal plant? Stelco was put in the middle of NOWHERE for a reason! Have you ever been to Nanticoke in the winter? The snow turns grey because of the soot that comes from the refinery! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92215

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I live in north Durham with my family and 3 girls. We would like to be able to subdivide our property into 2 acre parcels to build houses for our extended family and have them own the houses and property. This makes housing much more affordable and allows families to stay together. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92217

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The fact that OFA is pushing against dividing rural properties seems extremely unfair. Rural properties should be allowed to divide and if farmers do not want to subdivide land then they shouldnt. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92218

Commentaire fait au nom

The Corporation of Norfolk County

Statut du commentaire

Norfolk County Council appreciates the opportunity to provide comments in respect of the review of proposed policies adapted from A Place to Grow and Provincial Policy Statement to form a new provincial planning policy instrument. Council is very Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92219

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please accept my comments on the proposed changes to the Provincial Policy Statement, and the Places to Grow policies. See attached Word document Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92222

Commentaire fait au nom

Region of Peel

Statut du commentaire

Region of Peel response to ERO 019-6813 proposed Provincial Planning Statement natural heritage policies and definitions. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92223

Commentaire fait au nom

Town of Midland

Statut du commentaire

The Town of Midland provides the attached comments relating to Environmental Registry of Ontario posting #019-6813. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92225

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hello, I bring this comment/concern forward regarding the housing crisis in Ontario for people with developmental disabilities and the discriminatory barriers in the PPS 2020/ and proposed PPS 2023 that contribute to the housing crisis. Discrimination in PPS: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92226

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Your document is too long and its lack of transparency, and your egregious lack of notification to the public should not have been allowed at all. The document obviously favours development over all other considerations. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92227

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

July 31, 2023 Ministry of Municipal Affairs & Housing Provincial Land Use Plans Branch 777 Bay Street, 13th floor. Toronto, ON M7A 2J3 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92229

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We have farmed 100 acres in the Township of Blandford – Blenheim, County of Oxford for over 45 years. We have seen many changes to the rural landscape during that time. We support updating the Provincial Policy Statement in regards Agricultural land use and limited non-farm development. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92230

Commentaire fait au nom

County of Dufferin

Statut du commentaire

This letter addresses the proposed changes to the Provincial Policy Statement from the perspective of the County of Dufferin. The County of Dufferin supports increasing the supply of housing to accommodate the growing population, bolster economic growth, and improve housing affordability. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

92231

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Markham

Statut du commentaire

At its July 27, 2023 Special Council meeting, Markham Council considered the proposed natural heritage policies for the Provincial Planning Statement. Markham Council previously provided comments on the balance of the proposed Provincial Planning Statement. Lire davantage