I am concerned with the proposed changes making access to services such as libraries and other vital recreation facilities difficult for new community developments.
Read more
The only benefit of this act is to developers. Communities and municipalities will struggle. People need open space, public space, park space and these needs will be difficult to address when the choice is between parkland and developing other amenities and infrastructure.
Read more
I voted Conservative in the last election. I'm disappointed to see Bill 108 shift a local concern, land development approvals, to a provincial government body. As a conservative I believe in putting decision making authority at the lowest level possible.
Read more
I am in opposition to the section of this bill that refers to making decisions without considering prior actions taken in applications of appeal. I am specifically concerned about an appeal by the owner of a property in Bolton wanting to construct an asphalt plant there.
Read more
I am very concerned with the endangered species and environment protection acts being amended in such a loose and frantic manner. I feel like this Bill (108) is being forced through without the proper research. I don’t see any relevant data the supports why the existing act needs to be changed.
Read more
OSRTF fully supports the comments submitted by the the Ontario Greenbelt Alliance with respect to ERO 019-0017 and 019-0016, as provided below. We agree with comments to withdraw certain schedules of the bill as they erode the very core of science based and necessary environmental policy.
Read more
I support the submission of the OGA as attached below. Please stop creating Bills that ignore good environmental planning. This Bill does not support what its title professes. Please reconsider as per OGAs submission.
Thank You
Read more
I don’t agree with the creation of the new authority to decide on services such as libraries, day cares etc. especially in Brampton. Brampton has very high property taxes as it is already and is extremely housing dense.
Read more
I have serious concerns with the parts of this legislation that will return to the rules and emphasis of the old Ontario Municipal Board. Developers should not be able to take precedence over the needs of the community.
Read more
This new bill is not in the best interest of any community. Municipalities must be part of the decision making as we know what works best for our diverse populations.
Read more
I am against this bill. This government is doing everything that is going in a way to harm environment. In my opinion, parklands should be increased, need more greenbelt areas.
Read more
I reject Bill 108. This is a considerable step backwards with so many inclusions of so many amendments to Ontario's Endangered Species Act in Bill 108.
Read more
Parks and Recreation Ontario supports the government’s plan to make housing more attainable for Ontarians through increased housing options, while still protecting the province’s cultural heritage assets and environmentally sensitive areas.
Read more
The South Armour Heights Residents' Association (SAHRA) of Toronto supports the requests of the City of Toronto, the Large Urban Mayors' Caucus of Ontario, the Federation of North Toronto Residents' Associations, the Confederation of Ratepayers and Residents Associations, the Federation of Urban Nei
Read more
I am a member of a residents association focused on affordable housing promotion. We are committed to ensuring that the affordable housing needs of our low- and middle-income neighbours are met, and advocating for policy change to expand affordable housing supply is an important part of our work.
Read more
View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.
Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.
Download comments
I am concerned with the…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31911
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I strongly disagree with the…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31913
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The only benefit of this act…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31915
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I voted for the Conservative…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31917
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am in opposition to the…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31924
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am very concerned with the…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31926
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
OSRTF fully supports the…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31927
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I support the submission of…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31928
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I don’t agree with the…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31932
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I have serious concerns with…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31935
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
This new bill is not in the…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31936
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am against this bill. This…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31942
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I reject Bill 108. This is…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31943
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Parks and Recreation Ontario…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31947
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Bill 108, More Homes, More…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31952
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The South Armour Heights…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31956
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
ERO 019-0016 While I'm…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31963
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The City of Kingston…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31966
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am a member of a residents…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31978
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I oppose Bill 108
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31979
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions