Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment on

Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act

Comment ID

32029

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please do not put the LPAT back to the OMB approach... for once under LPAT where the official plan determined whether the residents had standing when Council won't listen... Our situation is that we are Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act

Comment ID

32037

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
They say the devil is in the details, and one might think, therefore, that as there are no regulations as yet, it would be impossible to comment on the effects of Bill 108. Unfortunately, it is not necessary to see the regulations to grasp the major implications of this Orwellian-titled Act. Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act

Comment ID

32039

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
They say the devil is in the details, and one might think, therefore, that as there are no regulations as yet, it would be impossible to comment on the effects of Bill 108. Unfortunately, it is not necessary to see the regulations to grasp the major implications of this Orwellian-titled Act. Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act

Comment ID

32051

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am distressed that this Bill takes away protections for threatened and endangered species at a time when we are at an extinction crisis. Please restore protections to threatened and endangered species. Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act

Comment ID

32054

Commenting on behalf of

Teddington Park Residents Association

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Teddington Park Residents Association Comments on Bill 108: More Homes, More Choice Act 1. There are significant reductions in opportunities for public input in planning • More decision-making at the modified LPAT ignores Council's decisions where residents had a voice Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act

Comment ID

32056

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am writing on behalf of Friends of Kensington Market, a community organization that is dedicated to the preservation and promotion of Kensington Market for the good of its community. Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act

Comment ID

32061

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
In my view, the amendments to the Planning Act will not speed up approvals as intended, but will lead to excessive delays if LPAT decisions have to be appealed to the Provincial Court. The shorter timelines will lead to poorer and more controversial decisions.

Related actions

Comment on

Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act

Comment ID

32064

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
My biggest concern with Schedule 12 is the reduced timeline for consideration of development proposals. 90 days does not allow enough time for good quality developments to be achieved in all cases. Surely we do not want to build shabby homes, nor to create dysfunctional neighbourhoods. Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act

Comment ID

32070

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Limiting inclusionary zoning to major transit station areas is wrong. It will create ghettoes, for both rich and poor It will undermine the intent of inclusionary zoning, which is to encourage a range of income levels throughout the city. Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act

Comment ID

32071

Commenting on behalf of

City of Brampton

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
City of Brampton May 29, 2019 The Honourable Doug Ford Premier of Ontario Legislative Building Queen's Park Toronto ON M7A 1A1 The Honourable Steve Clark Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing 17th Floor, 777 Bay St. Toronto ON M5G 2E5 Read more

Related actions