The Board of Directors for the Mississippi Valley Conservation Authority recommend that Schedule 2 not be removed from Bill 108 and deferred for further consideration for the following reasons:
Read more
I would like to voice my comment about Bill 108, especially on the proposal of having a LPAT. This is the same as OMB which is disbanded for a very good resson. I am strongly opposed bringing the process back.
Read more
This is a step backwards for Toronto being able to manage it's growth. The city has a planning process that aims to balance new residential construction and increased density with ensuring that the necessary infrastructure is available to support its residents.
Read more
Bill 180 is putting developers before people. Why is the provincial government changing its motto to "For the Developers". Doug Ford promised to be "For the People".
Preliminary Comments on Bill 108: More Homes, More Choice Act
1. Significantly reduces opportunities for public input in planning
- more decision-making at LPAT which ignores Council's decisions where residents had a voice
Read more
I am not pleased with many aspects of the amendments to the Planning Act and feel what is being planned unduly advantages developers at the expense of community needs.
Read more
The Government of Ontario's proposed drastic overhaul of Ontario’s Endangered Species Act, 2007
(ESA) through changes put forward in Schedule 5 of Bill 108, an omnibus bill tabled on May 2,
Read more
The current LPAT system was set up after months of public meetings and consultations with many experts. It is meant to balance the needs of developers and the needs of communities. Bill 108 reverses this democratic process, and is less ‘for the people’ and more ‘for the developers’.
Read more
I heartily concur with the City of Toronto's nigh-unanimous opposition to Bill 108; and, to the City's issues, concerns, and suggestions regarding Bill 108.
Please accept the attached document as Grey County's comments regarding Bill 108.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Best regards,
Randy Scherzer
Director of Planning
County of Grey
Read more
These sweeping changes to the Planning Act do not appear to reflect good planning principles, but rather serve to benefit developers only. As a professional planner I am very concerned at the government's disregard for the impact of these changes.
Read more
View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.
Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.
Download comments
The Board of Directors for…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31548
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The attached letter was…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31551
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Please find attached,…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31560
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I would like to voice my…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31566
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
This is a step backwards for…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31567
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Bill 180 is putting…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31570
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Preliminary Comments on Bill…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31574
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Dear Conservative government…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31576
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am not pleased with many…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31577
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I strongly disagree with…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31588
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The Government of Ontario's…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31590
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
To Whom it May Concern: The…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31592
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I agree with returning to an…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31593
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Dear MPPs Like so many…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31595
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The current LPAT system was…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31597
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I heartily concur with the…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31598
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Friends of Muskoka (FOM) has…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31601
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Please accept the attached…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31605
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am adamantly opposed to…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31608
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
These sweeping changes to…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 12) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Planning Act
Comment ID
31611
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions