I am the President of the St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Association (SLNA). I am writing to express our profound disagreement with Bill 108, which, if passed, will have wide ranging and detrimental impacts on our neighbourhood. Bill 108 proposes changes to 15 separate Acts.
Read more
Attached please find the “Joint Response of Eight Toronto Residents’ Associations to Provincial Bill 108 and to Proposed Changes to the Planning Act, the Development Charges Act, and the Ontario Heritage Act” submitted by Annex Residents’ Association, Garment District Residents’ Association, Grange
Read more
This schedule is basically a transfer payment from municipalities and their taxpayers to developers. Guelph has seen no issues with demand from developers with these fees in place. The only effect these charges will have is to increase the profits of developers.
Read more
On behalf of Municipality of Port Hope (MPH) and at the direction of Council, I am submitting preliminary comments to the Proposed Bill 108 (More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019) and the Proposed Housing Supply Action Plan, which is currently at first reading in the legislative process.
Read more
There is no benefit to reducing fees for developers.
It will be proposed by developers that they can introduce more product to the market at a lower price, but instead they will increase profits and shirk their responsibility as community builders.
Read more
Tay Valley Township uses Development Cost charges to pay for the additional equipment (fire trucks, snow plows), infrastructure (roads, parks), and services that are required when growth occurs.
Read more
I fully support the submission made by Ontario Greenbelt Alliance on Bill 108 - Schedule 3 - the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997.
Read more
I reject Bill 108. This is a considerable step backwards with so many inclusions of so many amendments to Ontario's Endangered Species Act in Bill 108.
Read more
Parks and Recreation Ontario supports the government’s plan to make housing more attainable for Ontarians through increased housing options, while still protecting the province’s cultural heritage assets and environmentally sensitive areas.
Read more
The South Armour Heights Residents' Association (SAHRA) of Toronto supports the requests of the City of Toronto, the Large Urban Mayors' Caucus of Ontario, the Federation of North Toronto Residents' Associations, the Confederation of Ratepayers and Residents Associations, the Federation of Urban Nei
Read more
We need development charges to pay for rec centres, parking, libraries, etc. I bet everyone on Ontario uses at least one of these! I am going to end of paying for these through higher property taxes. At least give cities time to plan for this change to avoid delaying projects already in the works.
I am writing as a staff member representing West Neighbourhood House, a United Way agency serving over 14,000 less-advantaged individuals a year, helping them to gain greater control over their lives and within their communities.
Read more
This is legislation that should not be passed. First and foremost we have regulations to protect our sensitive lands from development. The resulting effects following the introduction of this bill will decimate the value on due process and regulations from developers.
Read more
Centre for Equality Rights in Accommodation
427- 192 Spadina Avenue
Toronto, Ontario
M5T 2C2
Re: Bill 108 – More Homes, More Choice Act
About CERA
Read more
Committee Report
To: Warden Mitch Twolan
Members of the Planning and Development Committee
From: Kara Van Myall
Director of Planning and Development
Date: June 20, 2019
Re: Bill 108, More Homes, More Choice Proposed Changes Appended
Recommendation:
Read more
View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.
Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.
Download comments
Please refer to the attached…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 3) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997
Comment ID
31868
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am the President of the St…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 3) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997
Comment ID
31871
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Attached please find the …
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 3) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997
Comment ID
31876
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Good afternoon, My name is…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 3) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997
Comment ID
31886
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
This schedule is basically a…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 3) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997
Comment ID
31887
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
On behalf of Municipality of…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 3) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997
Comment ID
31894
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
There is no benefit to…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 3) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997
Comment ID
31897
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Responding to Bill 108, More…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 3) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997
Comment ID
31903
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Tay Valley Township uses…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 3) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997
Comment ID
31905
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I strongly disagree with the…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 3) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997
Comment ID
31912
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I fully support the…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 3) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997
Comment ID
31916
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I reject Bill 108. This is…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 3) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997
Comment ID
31944
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Parks and Recreation Ontario…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 3) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997
Comment ID
31948
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The South Armour Heights…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 3) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997
Comment ID
31957
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The City of Kingston…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 3) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997
Comment ID
31967
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
We need development charges…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 3) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997
Comment ID
31973
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am writing as a staff…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 3) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997
Comment ID
31981
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
This is legislation that…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 3) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997
Comment ID
31989
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Centre for Equality Rights…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 3) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997
Comment ID
31998
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Committee Report To: Warden…
Comment on
Bill 108 - (Schedule 3) – the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997
Comment ID
32002
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions