Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

32587

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
•Allowing municipalities, the power to prescribe the percentage of the land value that should be allocated to the CBC charge will likely pose problems and could make development less viable. Read more

Comment ID

32591

Commenting on behalf of

The York Catholic District School Board.

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
"I noted that in your list of organizations which are exempt from Community Benefits, the list did not include publicly funded school boards and their owned or leased sites. Read more

Comment ID

32716

Commenting on behalf of

Drewlo Holdings Inc. (Developer & Rental Housing Provider)

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Drewlo Holdings Inc. has significant concerns with the proposed implementation of a Community Benefits Charge and would offer the following comments: Read more

Comment ID

32803

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please see the below link to the County of Grey's comments on Bill 108: More Homes, More Choices Act, Environmental Registry Posting Numbers 019-0181, 019-0183, and 019-0184 and the Proposed Regulation changes under the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act, 19-MAG007. Read more

Comment ID

32811

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
•Allowing municipalities, the power to prescribe the percentage of the land value themselves that should be allocated to the CBC charge could be detrimental and could make development less viable from a financial perspective. This will in turn not increase the housing stock. Read more

Comment ID

32828

Commenting on behalf of

Regional Municipality of Niagara

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
On behalf of the Commissioner of Planning and Development Services of the Regional Municipality of Niagara, attached is Niagara’s comments to Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing “Proposed new regulation pertaining to the community benefits authority under the Planning Act” (ERO #019-0183). Read more

Comment ID

33092

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am asking the government of Ontario to stop legislation known as Bill 108 or at least delay it and provide for public meetings so that citizens and even municipal politicians can understand the impacts of such a wide ranging piece of legislation. Read more

Comment ID

33139

Commenting on behalf of

The City of Markham

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please see attached the City of Markham's comments on the proposed regulations for the Community Benefits Charge. The file includes the Council Resolution and recommendations, along with the supporting staff report. Read more

Comment ID

33145

Commenting on behalf of

Town of Wasaga Beach

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The most important deliverable for the province in Bill 108 implementation is to ensure that the intended savings through new/restricted municipal finance tools are passed down to the consumer to reduce housing prices and increase affordability. Please see the attached letters. Read more