Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

53256

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The proposed amendment to the Planning Act to allow a Minister’s zoning order (MZO) not to have to be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), and to permit existing MZOs not to be consistent with the PPS, even though this would not apply to lands within the Greenbelt Area, is giving t Read more

Comment ID

53258

Commenting on behalf of

Ontario Farmland Trust

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Ontario Farmland Trust (OFT) is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to protect and preserve Ontario farmlands and associated agricultural, natural, and cultural features of the countryside. Read more

Comment ID

53259

Commenting on behalf of

Ontario Nature

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Ontario Nature urges the government to remove Schedule 3 from Bill 257. Schedule 3 proposes to amend the Planning Act so that both existing and future Minister’s Zoning Orders – or MZOs - would no longer have to be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement. If passed, Schedule 3 would: Read more

Comment ID

53265

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The proposed amendment concerning Ministerial Zoning Orders (MZOs) appears to be constructed so that the concerns of Ontario citizens have no place in the Government's agenda. With no rights of appeal regarding decisions made under any MZOs we have reason to trust such decisions. Read more

Comment ID

53268

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I would like to take this opportunity to provide comment on the proposed changes to Minister’s Zoning Orders and the Planning Act contained within Schedule 3 of Bill 257, Supporting Broadband and Infrastructure Expansion Act, 2021. Read more

Comment ID

53273

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am concerned, disappointed, and angry that you have introduced legislation that amends the Planning Act to provide that Ministerial Zoning Orders (MZOs) are not required and are deemed to never have been required to be consistent with Provincial Policy Statements (PPS) issued under subsection 3 (1 Read more

Comment ID

53274

Commenting on behalf of

The South Armour Heights Residents' Association

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The members of our Residents' Association (850 households) are concerned, disappointed, and angry that you have introduced legislation that amends the Planning Act to provide that Ministerial Zoning Orders (MZOs) are not required and are deemed to never have been required to be consistent with Provi Read more

Comment ID

53288

Commenting on behalf of

Niagara Falls Nature Club

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please remove schedule 3 from Bill 257. Nature club members have participated in public consultations on the drafting and updating of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) over the course of many years. The PPS helps to clarify planning and any changes to it should be to make it more enforceable. Read more

Comment ID

53289

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Sir, Please remember that is country is a democracy. Giving the MMAH 'the authority to zone and thereby control the use of any land in the province' smacks a bit of imperialism. We are not fooled by your stated uses of MZOs: Read more

Comment ID

53308

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is the kind of policy that will facilitate unnecessary negative consequences for future development that is responsive to citizens'/provinces'/countries' needs. This is because it lends itself to 'misuse/misinterpretation'. Read more

Comment ID

53316

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please remove the dangerous policy changes that allow lands currently protected under the PPS tp become vulnerable to development, as the law will allow MZOs to be issued to fast-track development projects that destroy protected farmland, wetlands and natural features.