Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

77305

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There are so many reasons why this is a horrible idea for the citizens of Ontario (for whom Doug Ford claims to have in his best interests - what a crock!): -it will devastate our agriculture and grocery prices are already at an all-time high -it will be awful for the environment Read more

Comment ID

77310

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Accommodate any growth and support by building more homes on Grennbelt land is literally obscene in this day and age. To fail to find 7,400 acres which is not in the Greenbelt to develop is poor planning or it kowtows to the interest of developers. Read more

Comment ID

77311

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The attached letter is an objection to include 5285 Trafalgar Rd within the Greenbelt. We request, on behalf of our client, that the province exclude the subject property from the Greenbelt Inclusion. Please provide reference number for our submission. This submission is on behalf of our client Ms. Read more

Comment ID

77313

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
PLEASE think of the children and young adults in today’s world. Save our greenspace and build only on residential land….. we are forfeiting our future and that of our children by sacrificing important land which should be used for growing food to feed all these new Ontarians. Read more

Comment ID

77321

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I wish to voice, in the strongest possible terms, my opposition to de-protection and development of Greenbelt lands. The Greenbelt was meant to be protected in perpetuity so that there would be farmland and clean water in proximity to Toronto and the rest of the Greater Golden Horseshoe. Read more

Comment ID

77322

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The attached letter is an objection to include 343 Blue Lake Road located near St. George within the Greenbelt Boundary. We request, on behalf of our client, that the Ministry confirm that the subject site is excluded from the Greenbelt Inclusion. Read more

Comment ID

77325

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am completely against bill 23 and its proposed changes to the greenbelt. The amount of land already designated for development within existing municipal settlement boundaries far exceeds what is needed to meet long-range housing targets. This is from ontarionature.org Read more

Comment ID

77328

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
What kind of earth will we be leaving for our children if a portion of nature can not remain protected as sacred and unscathed. Please, I beg of you to stop putting economic interests always ahead of the environment. Ford - you are also going back on your promise!

Comment ID

77341

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Issue #1. The Ford government was elected with a promise from Doug Ford himself that he had listened to the people and he was not going to touch the Greenbelt. He has misled (lied?) To the people of Ontario to get elected, and on moral grounds the Greenbelt should not be touched. Read more