Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

104920

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am against the idea of pushing through building the 413 highway without following the required environmental laws and reviews. There is no valid reason to do this and makes the ontario government look untrustworthy to the public. Read more

Comment ID

104921

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is a dangerous proposal that fails to take into consideration the physical safety of cyclists or the environmental future of Ontario. Investment of tax payer dollars ought to be focused on increasing the viability of using carbon free methods of transportation.

Comment ID

104922

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Terrible decision to bypass the environmental assessments required to determine if construction will have a detrimental impact to the environment and society. This is cutting corners and too common from this government

Comment ID

104923

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The legislation does not acknowledge the Province's recognition of the value that bicycle infrastructure can have on improving traffic safety, reducing congestion, reducing pollution, improving public health or stimulating the local economy. Read more

Comment ID

104924

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Although traffic is a real problems in our city, this is not the way to solve it. Data, research, and common sense show that bike lanes are not the main reasons for traffic. In fact, the more safe and useful bike lanes are created, the less cars will be on the road. Read more

Comment ID

104925

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This seems like more red for something that a no issue that going to cost the tax payer for money to have the province review a municipal issue. Let the municipal make their own decisions for you was voted in their city. Why is the province stepping in. Seem silly and a waste of money.

Comment ID

104926

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The only, correct way to reduce gridlock is to reduce demand for cars/trucks/etc. This is accomplished by **increasing** public transport and other alternative transport methods like bicycling. Read more

Comment ID

104927

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This policy is terrible. It will not reduce gridlock. It will increase death and injury. Bike lanes are part of the *solution* to gridlock. A connected active transportation network and a great public transit system get people out of cars. Too many cars cause gridlock. This should be obvious.

Comment ID

104929

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Not only are you endangering the lives of cyclists, but you are using this bill to create highways that nobody needs while bypassing existing regulations for environmental assessment and property expropriation: Read more

Comment ID

104930

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This bill is a massive waste of resources, bike lanes keep bikes out of traffic and thus prevent them from slowing down cars. It's also much safer for everyone and better for the environment. The official government should let municipalities decide where bike lanes make sense

Comment ID

104931

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Nothing in this bill is in the interests of the people of Ontario. We need municipalities to be allowed to make their own decisions about infrastructure based on their constituents and studies. This is overreach obviously directed at Toronto. Read more

Comment ID

104935

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I cannot support a government or a proposal that panders to drivers driving fast and cheap, ignoring safety, fiscal responsibility, accessibility, mobility, climate change mitigation and virtually every other indicator saying this act is a horrendous waste

Comment ID

104936

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This bill is foolish. The only way to reduce traffic on arterial roads is to reduce the need for cars. Cars are traffic. More room for cars will induce more demand. Alternatives like more public transit and more safe and connected bike lanes are the only ways to reduce traffic. Read more

Comment ID

104938

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As someone who lives in a rural area, I am appalled at the government’s lack of logical thinking in proposing the removal of bike lanes and increasing cars as the solution to our problems. We need to be actively pursuing alternative forms of transport in all areas including Toronto. Read more

Comment ID

104940

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Bike lanes on main roads are a critical component in reducing congestion on Ontario’s roads. Cycling infrastructure takes up considerably less space than car infrastructure to move the same number of people. Read more