Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

102570

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am deeply concerned with this proposed legislation, and sincerely hope the government reconsiders it. This is not an exhaustive list, but here are some reasons: Read more

Comment ID

102571

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Bill proposes to give the province jurisdiction to approve new bicycle lanes. However this would not be effective since most multilane roads in Ontario do not set a meaningful net increase in throughput when the number of lanes is more than 1 in each direction. Read more

Comment ID

102572

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The provincial government should devote their energy to other, more worthwhile causes. Facilitating the efficient and timely movement of people through any city requires a multifaceted approach, not a one-size-fits-all mindset. Read more

Comment ID

102574

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am strongly against this new ruling, which appears to be political nonsense rather than a plan designed to help reduce traffic. Essentially all research shows that bike lanes and improved alternatives to driving reduce traffic, not adding more roads or lanes. Read more

Comment ID

102578

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The proposed law is counterproductive and far from achieving its aim of improving traffic, it will only serve to make things worse by removing alternatives to driving. I strongly recommend looking into the concept of "induced demand." Read more

Comment ID

102579

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
KEEP THE EXISITING BIKE LANES! BUILD MORE BIKE LANES! BIKE LANES BELONG ON MAIN ROADS, NOT SIDE STREETS! BUILD MORE PUBLIC TRANSIT! INSENTIVIZE A VARIETY OF TRANSIT OPTIONS. DETER SINGLE OCCUPANT VEHICLES FROM DOMINATING THE ROADS!

Comment ID

102581

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It appears this legislation is pushing us in the wrong direction. Instead of providing infrastructure that encourages people to consider biking or improving public transit investments it will punish people ACTUALLY engaged in the solution (MORE BIKES=LESS CARS). Read more

Comment ID

102582

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Thank you for opening this to public comment. Points 2 and 3, regarding accidents and broadband internet, are not apparent in how they are relevant to this proposal and are independent concerns. Read more

Comment ID

102583

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The solution to gridlock is not to build more road capacity or rove bike lanes to allow for more cars. The only thing that causes gridlock is cars. Cities around the world have tried the very experiment this government is proposing and it has failed every time. Read more

Comment ID

102586

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I drive everyday. On street parking creates gridlock. Not bike lanes. Bike lanes save lives and encourage more people to use them to safely get to work. Take away bike lanes, you move that person into another car, creating gridlock. Read more

Comment ID

102587

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I think that the legislation for the province to meddle in the affairs of municipalities is an over-reach. Cities should be the ones who make decisions on whether and where a bike lane is appropriate. It seems that there is always extensive public consultation before any such action is taken. Read more

Comment ID

102589

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I'm disappointed in the provinces decision to remove bike lanes, which regularly show in data to improve safety for drivers and cyclists. Bike lanes also benefit local small businesses by improving access. The decision the province is making to improve traffic is not rooted in data.

Comment ID

102591

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Bike lanes in toronto should remain as is and the government should stop wasting tax payer money on frivolous nanny state schemes by letting municipalities choose their own destiny. Read more

Comment ID

102592

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I support this. I support this even though I am a year-round cyclist in the City of Toronto. In fact - I support this because I am a year-round cyclist in the City of Toronto. I use Bike Lanes everyday. I can unequivocally say that: Read more