Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

115043

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the recent legislative amendment that mandates Ministry approval for bicycle lane designs in specific municipal situations, as outlined in Bill 212. Read more

Comment ID

115045

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
None of the bike lanes currently in Toronto should be removed. These bike lanes take up a fraction of space in a city whose streets are almost entirely devoted to cars. Most streets in Toronto do not have bike lanes, so removing them will not open up an appreciable amount of lanes. Read more

Comment ID

115046

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This Bill flies in the face of all common sense, evidence-supported policy-making, and modern standards for street design, and It is yet more ideologically and politically motivated overreach by the province. Read more

Comment ID

115047

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am strongly opposed to Bill 212. As a daily cyclist and a Toronto resident, I rely on bike lanes to commute safely and efficiently. By choosing to cycle, I’m helping reduce congestion and pollution, making the city more livable for everyone. Read more

Comment ID

115048

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
First, I am driver, a cyclist and a pedestrian. We need solutions that work for everyone. Second, I think everyone agrees that traffic congestion in places like Toronto and Ottawa is a major issue that deserves thoughtful deliberation to achieve real solutions. Read more

Comment ID

115049

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am strongly opposed to Bill 212. As a daily cyclist and a Toronto resident, I rely on bike lanes to commute safely and efficiently to work as well as to various businesses along Bloor. By choosing to cycle, I’m helping reduce congestion and pollution, making the city more livable for everyone. Read more

Comment ID

115050

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These bike lanes were definitely not planned properly. I have barely seen any bikers in summer and I'm sure there will be barely any in winter. For the added congestion and traffic added to everyone living in this area this was definitely a failed project. Read more

Comment ID

115051

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am disappointed that this piece of legislation is so disjointed from evidence and studies. 1. Congestion is more caused by parked cars and construction occupying the right lane, limiting lanes of traffic and causing more lane changes Read more

Comment ID

115052

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Bravo! Finally some common sense with the removal of these seldom used lanes. I invite Olivia Chow and all the city councilors to come down to Royal York and Bloor and count the number of cyclists that ride their bikes in the lanes on a given day. Even on a weekend. Read more

Comment ID

115053

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I live in downtown Toronto. I cycle to work, for errands and for pleasure. I have a car that I use for travel that is more then 100km distance. I am able to cycle and keep my car off the streets because of bike lanes. Read more

Comment ID

115055

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As a Tax Payer, Driver and Cyclist in Ontario, I an very concerned with this proposed legislation and the negative impacts it will have on the progress that has been made to date on integrating greater cycling infrastructure into the Ontario road system. Read more

Comment ID

115056

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Bike lane approval has always been a municipal decision and not a provincial decision. Adding provincial red tape hinders the ability of municipalities and local communities across Ontario to make their own decisions. Read more

Comment ID

115061

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Proposed Bill 212 focus on removing bike lanes and requiring municipalities to get provincial approval to install new bike lanes. This unequivocally, wastes tax payers money, increases red tape and bureaucracy, and will negatively affect public health and safety. Read more

Comment ID

115062

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I ride a bike to get around the city. If we lost bike lanes, it would make it more dangerous to ride. I was ran off the road by a truck and would have died if I didn't jump off the bike. If there was a bike lane, that would have never happened. Read more

Comment ID

115063

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The bike lanes on bloor west since being introduced has significantly impacted traffic in a negative way. A commute to take my daughter from bloor west village to the Kingsway for swimming lessons was once 5 minutes now takes upwards of 20 minutes while we see no cyclists using the bike lane. Read more

Comment ID

115064

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The bike lanes on Bloor west from high park through Etobicoke have been a disaster. They are not well used, cost way too much where those neighbourhood could have better used the money for other capital investment and have closed so much traffic gridlock as pollution from idling cars. Read more