Update Announcement
On May 5, 2025, we added a link to Bill 5, Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act, 2025 under the Related Links section of this notice.
This consultation was open from:
April 17, 2025
to May 17, 2025
Decision summary
A decision has been made to amend the Mining Act to implement a One Project, One Process (1P1P) approach and to amend to the Mining Act, Energy Board Act, 1998, and Electricity Act,1998 to introduce new authorities to protect the strategic national mineral supply chain, and limit foreign participation in Ontario’s energy sector.
Decision details
On June 5, 2025, Schedules 1, 5, and 6 of Bill 5: Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy received Royal Assent. As a result, various amendments were made to the Mining Act, Electricity Act, 1998 and Energy Board Act, 1998. Schedule 5 comes into force on a day to be named by order of the Lieutenant Governor in Council.
Schedule 5 amends the Mining Act to include a One Project, One Process approach (1P1P) for designated projects and new authorities to help secure the strategic national mineral supply chain. Some of the significant amendments the Mining Act are described below.
- Legislating a One Project One Process (1P1P) Approach for Permitting Projects
The newly legislated 1P1P approach introduces a new process for any project designated by the Minister of Energy and Mines (the Minister). Traditionally all mining proponents would have to engage multiple permitting ministries and Indigenous communities independently or separately on each individual permit or authorization required for a mine project. 1P1P provides dedicated project management support, looking at the whole project, to coordinate the authorization and permitting and consultation process for designated mining projects. This approach is intended to help streamline the approval process and reduce government review time, while also fulfilling its constitutional obligations to Indigenous communities.
Key elements of the amendments to the Mining Act are described below.
- The Minister has the authority to establish a Mine Authorization and Permitting Delivery Team (MAPDT) for mine projects designated by the Minister.
- The Deputy Minister of Energy and Mines has the authority to appoint a Team Lead for each MAPDT.
- Once all required information is received from the proponent, the MAPDT must prepare an integrated authorization, permitting and consultation plan (“the plan”), and coordinate with any other ministry to expedite the application, review and decision-making processes for the permits and authorizations specified in the plan.
- The Lieutenant Governor in Council (LGIC) has the regulation-making authority to prescribe service standards to be met by any ministry under any Act for permits and authorizations specified in the plan.
- Such regulations may specify whether a proponent is entitled to the refund of any fees for failure to meet those service standards, as may be prescribed.
- They also include notifications to the Minister and ADM simultaneously when an issue that may potentially delay timelines is raised.
Mining projects require permits and authorizations from multiple ministries, with each ministry conducting their own individual review process for permits or authorizations, and consultation with Indigenous communities, if applicable. The current process has led to duplication, delays in decision-making and increased burden for Indigenous communities, who are consulted on the individual permit applications for the same project area. The 1P1P process will coordinate the permitting process, reducing duplication and delays and saving time and money.
The 1P1P approach does not replace any regulatory or legislative requirements from proponents.
The addition of the 1P1P approach to the Mining Act will not result in an impact to the environment as it is limited to establishing the administrative process to work with proponents, and other ministries and support a more coordinated approach to fulfilling the Crown’s duty to consult with Indigenous communities. 1P1P will allow ministry staff to work with the proponent in developing an integrated authorization, permitting and consultation plan to navigate the permitting landscape and processes across ministries. Proponents are still required to comply with the Mining Act and any other applicable regulatory requirements (e.g., MNR, MECP, etc.).
- Limiting Foreign Jurisdictions’ Participation in Ontario’s Economy
Bill 5: The Protect Ontario by Unleashing Our Economy includes several amendments to secure Ontario’s economy from foreign antagonists.
Protecting the Strategic National Mineral Supply Chain
Amendments made to the Mining Act include new tools that allow Ontario to take the steps necessary, if desirable to protect the strategic national mineral supply chain.
Key elements of the amendments to the Mining Act are described below.
- The purpose of the Mining Act includes a reference to the protection of Ontario’s economy.
- The Minister may suspend or shut down all or some functions of the Mining Lands Administration System (MLAS), if in the Minister’s opinion the order is desirable for the protection of the strategic national mineral supply chain.
- In making a determination, the Minister must consider any risk assessment provided by the Ministry of the Solicitor General, the economic interests of Ontario, and any prescribed factors.
- The Minister may make an order in respect of the following, if in the opinion of the Minister the order is desirable for the protection of the strategic national mineral supply chain:
- Suspend, restrict, or terminate MLAS accounts and prospector’s licenses.
- Prohibit a person from registering as a user on MLAS or obtaining a prospector’s license.
- Deny a lease issuance.
- Subject to the prior Lieutenant Governor in Council approval, cancel or revoke unpatented mining claims or licenses of occupation, and terminate leases.
- In making a determination, the Minister would consider any risk assessment provided by the Ministry of the Solicitor General, the economic interests of Ontario, and any prescribed factors in making these decisions.
- Suspend, restrict, or terminate MLAS accounts and prospector’s licenses.
These changes will help ensure that Ontario has the tools it needs to protect the strategic national mineral supply chain.
There are no anticipated environmental impacts associated with these legislative changes.
Limiting Foreign Jurisdictions’ Participation in Ontario’s Energy Sector
MEM has made legislative amendments, under the Electricity Act, 1998 and the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998 to:
- Establish regulation-making authority to enable the ministry to limit the participation of foreign jurisdictions in Ontario’s electricity sector (i.e., specifically as it relates to foreign equipment, systems, services, facilities or technologies, business operations, ownership). In addition, the legislative updates ensure the Minister’s directive making authority aligns with this approach.
- This approach will allow the government to achieve its commitment to keep the province’s energy supply safe and secure by limiting the involvement of foreign antagonists in Ontario’s electricity sector as deemed appropriate by the government. In addition, the amendments enable a mechanism to respond to future trade restrictions imposed by other countries which target the Canadian/Ontario economy.
- The ministry previously had authority to direct on matters relating to electricity procurement, but these new authorities formalize the government’s ability to outline specific parameters pertaining to the country, region or territory of origin and their abilities to participate in Ontario’s electricity sector. With respect to resource procurements, the ministry’s actions to limit foreign participation in the energy sector would focus on future resource procurement activities, and not processes already launched, awarded and being implemented.
- Success of this initiative will be directly monitored through future electricity procurement processes launched via the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) and other energy sector entities.
These amendments allow the government to achieve its commitment to keep the province’s energy supply safe and secure by limiting participation or components from companies or entities from specific countries (or foreign state-owned enterprises) in Ontario’s energy sector (i.e., to protect against risks of malware, manipulation, tampering, extortion, surveillance, ratepayer harms and other prospective threats directly or by extension from a foreign state-owned enterprise).
There are no anticipated environmental impacts as a result of these administrative changes to the Electricity Act, 1998 or the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998.
Effects of consultation
General
Request for extended consultation period.
Requests to extend the consultation window were considered but not chosen to proceed with.
Legislating a One Project One Process (1P1P) Approach for Permitting Projects
Misunderstanding of proposal
Some commenters may have misunderstood the 1P1P proposal as being similar to or part of the Special Economic Zones framework found in Schedule 9 of Bill 5: Protect Ontario by Unleashing the Economy Act, 2025. 1P1P establishes a new administrative process to streamline the authorization, permitting and consultation process for any project designated by the Minister of Energy and Mines.
Effects of reduced approval times on consultation and environmental requirements.
Some commenters expressed concerns that streamlined approval processes and shorter timelines for mine permitting could include removing or overlooking certain environmental or social considerations, or reducing or removing consultation requirements, thus weakening regulatory oversight.
The 1P1P process includes the development of an integrated authorization and permitting and consultation plan. The plan would identify the required permits and authorization for a designated project and the Indigenous communities associated with a given project area, the considerations for consolidating application requirements or review processes, and where it is possible, to remove duplication.
The Ministry intends to support the permitting and approvals process under 1P1P with technical expertise and appropriate staffing to enable coordinated reviews while maintaining strong regulatory oversight. The Ministry is committed to fulfilling the Crown’s Duty to Consult obligations.
Permitting ministries remain responsible and accountable with respect to matters within their respective mandates and legislative authorities, including administration of their respective statutes, regulations, policies, and fulfilling the Crown’s Duty to Consult.
Opportunities for engagement
There will be further engagement with the mining industry on 1P1P as the ministry develops an implementation plan.
Some commenters expressed specific concerns that the 1P1P framework and the new service standards would provide fewer opportunities for local and Indigenous engagement. The 1P1P approach is expected to support consultation with Indigenous communities by coordinating communication across ministries on a project by project basis, rather than on a permit by permit basis. Currently, each ministry leads consultation separately on each individual permit or authorization. This may add to the capacity pressures faced by Indigenous communities, who may also be reviewing other permit applications for activities proposed within their territories.
The MAPDTs will engage directly with Indigenous communities and proponents throughout the 1P1P process.
The ministry appreciates all feedback received through this consultation on Indigenous engagement and will endeavor to develop consultation plans that are responsive to this input.
Fairness in Designated Projects
The 1P1P model allows any project designated by the Minister—based on defined criteria— to be assigned a MAPDT. Supporting projects in this manner will help ensure that MAPDT resources are strategically allocated to projects that will benefit most from the process, ultimately providing the best outcomes for Ontario.
Some commenters expressed concern that this approach could lead to preferential treatment for certain projects and developers. The ministry acknowledges these concerns and will establish clear criteria to guide the Minister’s designation(s) to ensure consistency and accountability. These criteria will support the identification of projects where a coordinated approach to permitting, authorization and consultation would support more efficient and timely review processes.
Protecting Ontario’s Strategic National Mineral Supply Chain
Misunderstanding of the proposal
Comments were generally doubtful or confused about this proposal. Some commentators were concerned that the Minister's power to suspend or shut down all or part of MLAS would mean that certain requirements would be paused allowing proponents to bypass them. The ministry has read and considered these comments and would like to assure the public that this is not the case. If MLAS is suspended or shut down, it would mean that the website for the Mining Lands Administration System would be unavailable and proponents would be unable to access MLAS which may include registering a new claim, for the duration of the suspension or shut down.
Some comments expressed concern that shutting down MLAS would reduce transparency. MLAS is a public facing system. MLAS is not an accountability tool for the public to use to oversee mining activities, it is used by proponents to register mining claims. Any suspension or shutdown would be subject to the time period set out in the Minister’s order.
Purpose of the Mining Act
Several comments were concerned about the changes to the purpose of the Mining Act to refer to the protection of Ontario’s economy. Commenters suggested that if this is included then the purpose should also include the importance of respecting treaty rights and protecting the public and the environment. The ministry would like to assure the public that the purpose statement otherwise remains the same. Specifically, the purpose would retain the following language: “recognition and affirmation of existing Aboriginal and treaty rights in section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, including the duty to consult, and to minimize the impact of these activities on public health and safety and the environment.” This amendment adds new language to the purpose (protecting the economy) to the Mining Act, it does not delete what is currently in the purpose statement or eliminate duty to consult obligations.
Concerns about the details of the proposal
Some commenters noted that this proposal was lacking in detail about how these powers were intended to be used. The powers are intended to be used in circumstances where the Minister considers it desirable to protect the strategic national mineral supply chain. Before making an order, the Minister must also consider any risk assessment provided by the Ministry of the Solicitor General, the economic interests of Ontario, and any prescribed factors.
Applicability and impact to Indigenous communities and Indigenous claim owners
Some commenters have suggested that these powers should not be used to cancel or restrict the transfer of claims, leases, or prospector accounts from Indigenous proponents. The intent of this proposal is to protect the strategic national mineral supply chain. It is expected that these powers would be used in to protect the strategic national supply chain from foreign antagonists.
Concerns that this proposal could deter investment
Some commenters were concerned that the power to “take away mining rights” such as mining claims and leases could create uncertainty for investors. Commentators noted that proponents could be less likely to invest in Ontario if their mining rights could be terminated, as their investment would be lost.
In recognition of the potential impact to a claim holder or lease holder, LGIC approval would be required before a Minister makes an order to cancel or revoke an unpatented mining claim or a licence of occupation or terminate a lease of any mining lands or mining rights.
Limiting Foreign Jurisdictions’ Participation in Ontario’s Energy Sector
Project Development
Commenters raised concerns that new regulation/directive making authority may hinder the development of renewable energy projects and other energy initiatives. These could lead to increased ratepayer costs and emissions. There was a strong emphasis on a need for consultation and careful implementation for any future regulations or requirements.
The legislative amendments only include authority for the government to make future regulations and/or directives. Should regulations be introduced in the future, there would be extensive engagement with stakeholders to ensure Ontario’s energy sector remains affordable, clean, and reliable.
With respect to resource procurements, the ministry’s actions to limit foreign participation in the energy sector would focus on future resource procurement activities, not processes already launched, awarded and being implemented.
Foreign Ownership
Commenters suggested that foreign ownership be included in the proposed amendments.
The government introduced Motions that have amended the language in Schedule 1 (Electricity Act, 1998) to include ownership and business operations (e.g., head offices, ownership, employee locations) as methods to define a foreign entity.
Duty to Consult and Accountability
Commentators expressed concern that the amendments may extinguish the Crown’s Duty to Consult obligations along with providing the government broad protections that can reduce accountability.
The legislative amendments are not intended to extinguish any existing Duty to Consult obligations. Furthermore, the liability clauses in the amendments are specific to potential implementation of Bill 5’s amendments related to limiting foreign participation in Ontario’s energy sector.
Supporting materials
View materials in person
Some supporting materials may not be available online. If this is the case, you can request to view the materials in person.
Get in touch with the office listed below to find out if materials are available.
99 Wellesley St W
Toronto,
ON
M7A 1W3
Canada
933 Ramsey Lake Rd
Willet Green Miller Ctr 2nd Flr
Sudbury,
ON
P3E 6B5
Canada
Connect with us
Contact
MiningActAmendments@ontario.ca
Original proposal
Proposal details
MEM is seeking feedback on legislative and regulatory amendments to the Mining Act, 1990, Electricity Act, 1998 and Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998 through Bill 2, Protect Ontario by Unleashing Our Economy Act, 2025. This Bill if passed, would make several amendments to these Acts including legislating a new One Project, One Process (1P1P) approach intended to reduce government review time for designated mine projects that require permits and authorizations from multiple ministries, legislating new authorities to help secure strategic national mineral supply chains, and creating regulation-making authority limiting foreign jurisdiction's participation in Ontario’s energy sector. More details on each of these initiatives follows.
Legislating a One Project, One Process (1P1P) Approach for Mine Permitting
This proposal, if passed, would enshrine in legislation a new process for the coordination of permitting for designated mine projects, moving from a state where mining proponents engage with multiple permitting ministries and Indigenous communities on each activity separately and in isolation, towards an integrated and coordinated approach where the whole project would be considered by ministries in parallel with dedicated project management support.
Key elements of the proposed legislative changes for the 1P1P approach include:
- Granting the Minister of Energy and Mines the authority to establish a Mine Authorization and Permitting Delivery Team (MAPDT) for mine projects to be designated by the Minister.
- Granting the Deputy Minister of Energy and Mines the authority to appoint a Team Lead for each MAPDT.
- Requiring the MAPDT to work with the proponent once all required information has been submitted to prepare an integrated authorization and permitting plan, and to coordinate the application, review, and decision-making processes among ministries to expedite the application, review and decision making processes for the permits and authorizations specified in the plan.
- Establishing regulation-making authority for the Lieutenant Governor in Council (LGIC) to prescribe service standards to be met by any ministry under any Act for permits and authorizations specified in the plan.
- Such regulations may specify whether a proponent is entitled to the refund of any fees for failure to meet those service standards, as may be prescribed.
- Any service standards prescribed by the LGIC would not apply to the time required for:
- any efforts by the Crown to fulfil the duty to consult with Aboriginal communities after the consultation has commenced
- the proponent to complete its application and satisfy requirements,
- the time to complete the environmental assessment requirements; and
- land disposition requirements or processes under the Mining Act and any other Act.
- In addition to the proposed legislative changes, the Deputy Minister of MEM would set out criteria for the activities of the MAPDTs to ensure dedicated support for designated mining projects.
MEM would also proceed with establishing regular tracking, monitoring, and reporting of any applicable service standards for mine development permits and authorizations.
Mining projects in Ontario are regulated by several ministries, each dealing with different permits or authorizations separately. This means that both project proponents and Indigenous communities may go through multiple, repetitive processes on a permit by permit basis. The new proposal aims to streamline these processes, reducing duplication and delays by taking a project level approach.
There are no anticipated environmental impacts resulting from the proposed changes to the Mining Act, 1990. If the proposed change is passed, proponents would continue to be subject to the requirements as outlined under the Mining Act framework, which includes the Mine Rehabilitation Code. Proponents would also continue to be subject to the requirements as set out by the other permitting ministries.
Limiting Foreign Jurisdictions’ Participation in Ontario’s Economy
Initiatives have been proposed by MEM and partner ministries to secure Ontario’s economy from threats by foreign antagonists, including protecting the energy sector against risks of malware, manipulation, tampering, extortion, surveillance, rate payer harms, and other prospective threats directly or by extension from a foreign state-owned enterprise, as well as the mining sector and protecting the strategic national mineral supply chain.
Protecting the Strategic National Mineral Supply Chain
MEM proposes to make legislative changes to the Mining Act,1990 that, if passed, would introduce new tools to allow Ontario to take action to protect the strategic national mineral supply chain. The proposed changes include:
- Amending the purpose of the Mining Act, 1990 to refer to the protection of Ontario’s economy.
- Providing the Minister with the authority to suspend or shut down all or some functions of the MLAS where desirable to protect the strategic national mineral supply chain.
- The Minister would consider any risk assessment provided by the Ministry of the Solicitor General, the economic interests of Ontario, and any prescribed factors in making these decisions.
- Allowing the Minister to make an order in respect of the following, if in the opinion of the Minister it is desirable to protect the strategic national mineral supply chain:
- Suspend, restrict, or terminate MLAS accounts and prospector’s licenses.
- Prohibit a person from registering as a user on MLAS or obtaining a prospector’s license.
- Deny a lease issuance.
- Subject to the prior Lieutenant Governor in Council approval, cancel or revoke unpatented mining claims or licenses of occupation, and terminate leases.
- In making an order, the Minister would consider any risk assessment provided by the Ministry of the Solicitor General, the economic interests of Ontario, and any prescribed factors in making these decisions.
We are proposing these changes to protect Ontario’s mineral resources and the strategic national mineral supply chain.
There are no anticipated environmental impacts as a result of these proposed changes to the Mining Act, 1990.
Limiting Foreign Jurisdictions’ Participation in Ontario’s Energy Sector
MEM is additionally proposing legislative amendments, under the Electricity Act, 1998 and the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998 to:
- Establish regulation-making authority to enable MEM to limit the participation of foreign jurisdictions in Ontario’s electricity sector (i.e., specifically as it relates to foreign equipment, systems, services, facilities or technologies). In addition, MEM proposes legislative updates to the Minister’s directive making authority to align with this approach.
- This approach would allow the government to achieve its commitment to keep the province’s energy supply safe and secure by limiting the involvement of foreign antagonists in Ontario’s electricity sector as deemed appropriate by the government. In addition, this proposal would enable a mechanism to respond to future trade restrictions imposed by other countries which target the Canadian/Ontario economy.
- MEM currently has authority to direct on matters relating to electricity procurement, but the proposal for these new authorities would formalize the government’s ability to outline specific parameters pertaining to the country, region or territory of origin and their abilities to participate in Ontario’s electricity sector. Note: With respect to resource procurements, MEM’s proposal to limit foreign participation in the energy sector would focus on future resource procurement activities not processes already launched, awarded and being implemented.
- Success of this proposal would be directly monitored through future electricity procurement processes launched via IESO and other energy sector entities.
MEM’s proposal would allow the government to achieve its commitment to keep the province’s energy supply safe and secure by limiting participation or components from companies or entities from specific countries (or foreign state-owned enterprises) in Ontario’s energy sector (i.e., to protect against risks of malware, manipulation, tampering, extortion, surveillance, rate payer harms and other prospective threats directly or by extension from a foreign state-owned enterprise).
There are no anticipated environmental impacts as a result of these proposed administrative changes to the Electricity Act, 1998 or the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998.
Anticipated Results:
The Ministry anticipates this will lead to a clearer, more streamlined process for mining project proponents and ensure greater security over Ontario’s resources.
Regulatory impact analysis/statement (mandatory for Regulations)
Legislating a One Project, One Process (1P1P) Approach for Mine Permitting
It is not anticipated that this proposal will have regulatory impacts as it provides the authority for MEM to establish MAPDT and does not create new impacts on business. Upon issuing any new regulations associated with this proposed amendment, further regulatory impact assessments would be undertaken.
Protecting Mining Industry from Foreign Antagonists
It is not anticipated that this proposal will have regulatory impacts on the mining sector or the general public in this stage of the proposal.
Immediate outcomes of this proposal include acting, if desirable, to protect the strategic national mineral supply chain.
Limiting Foreign Jurisdictions’ Participation in Ontario’s Economy
It is not anticipated that this proposal will have regulatory impacts on the sector or the general public in this stage of the proposal. Upon issuing new regulations and/or Minister’s Directives associated with this amendment, further regulatory impact assessments would be undertaken.
Immediate outcomes of this proposal include solidifying MEM’s authority to provide direction to the energy sector at a future date related to foreign participation in energy procurements.
Supporting materials
View materials in person
Some supporting materials may not be available online. If this is the case, you can request to view the materials in person.
Get in touch with the office listed below to find out if materials are available.
99 Wellesley St W
Toronto,
ON
M7A 1W3
Canada
933 Ramsey Lake Rd|Willet Green Miller Ctr 2nd Flr
Sudbury ,
ON
P3E 6B5
Canada
Comment
Commenting is now closed.
This consultation was open from April 17, 2025
to May 17, 2025
Comments received
Through the registry
192By email
0By mail
0