In section 5.4.1 reference is made to multiple gas probes being installed in a single borehole. Clause 12 (a) vi of Table 4 of Schedule E of O.Reg 153/04 prohibits the installation of multiple probes in a single borehole, for MGRAs.
The 2011 version of the draft guidance included the following description in Appendix III. However it is missing from the draft 2013 version. Does this paragraph still apply? If not, is a definition of F1 and F2 fractions forthcoming?
Comment #1 This draft guidance document does not consider the most recent literature and research differentiating the attenuation response of petroleum hydrocarbon vapours in the subsurface as compared with historical databases based on chlorinated contaminant vapours migrating in subsurf
We have identified two concerns relating to the toxicity reference values (TRVs) used in the derivation of the “Recommended Health-Based Indoor Air Target Levels for Selected VOCs” (Appendix IV) proposed in the document.
View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.
Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.
Download comments
In section 5.4.1 reference…
Comment on
Technical Guidance: Soil Vapour Intrusion Assessment
Comment ID
46721
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
In section 5.4.1 reference is made to multiple gas probes being installed in a single borehole. Clause 12 (a) vi of Table 4 of Schedule E of O.Reg 153/04 prohibits the installation of multiple probes in a single borehole, for MGRAs.
Read moreRelated actions
The 2011 version of the…
Comment on
Technical Guidance: Soil Vapour Intrusion Assessment
Comment ID
46722
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
The 2011 version of the draft guidance included the following description in Appendix III. However it is missing from the draft 2013 version. Does this paragraph still apply? If not, is a definition of F1 and F2 fractions forthcoming?
Read moreRelated actions
Comment #1 This draft…
Comment on
Technical Guidance: Soil Vapour Intrusion Assessment
Comment ID
46723
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Comment #1 This draft guidance document does not consider the most recent literature and research differentiating the attenuation response of petroleum hydrocarbon vapours in the subsurface as compared with historical databases based on chlorinated contaminant vapours migrating in subsurf
Read moreRelated actions
We have identified two…
Comment on
Technical Guidance: Soil Vapour Intrusion Assessment
Comment ID
46724
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
We have identified two concerns relating to the toxicity reference values (TRVs) used in the derivation of the “Recommended Health-Based Indoor Air Target Levels for Selected VOCs” (Appendix IV) proposed in the document.
Read moreRelated actions
Conestoga Rovers &…
Comment on
Technical Guidance: Soil Vapour Intrusion Assessment
Comment ID
46725
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Conestoga Rovers & Associates (CRA) reviewed the Ministry of the Environment’s (MOE’s) Draft Technical Guidance: Soil Vapour Intrusion Assessment (Technical Guidance) posted on the Environmental Registry under EBR Registry Number: 011 2912.
Read moreRelated actions