Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

81088

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
December 9, 2022 RE: Bill 23, More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 I am a retired ecologist with a doctorate in biology. I would like to comment on the shortsightedness of reducing the role of Conservation Authorities in planning for development in Ontario. Read more

Comment ID

81092

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Only helps developers, tipped off by Ford.. taxpayers will pay for the infrastructure.. Shady at least, corrupt and possibly illegal. Development of brown fields should be considered. Low income housing should be a priority NOT an afterthought. Read more

Comment ID

81103

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Greenbelt is a very important space for all Ontarians. If the Greenbelt is disrupted due to development, there will be irreparable harm to the ecosystems and the wildlife that live there. We will never be able to get those ecosystems in the habitat for sensitive organisms back. Read more

Comment ID

81116

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
1. Changes should not be made, which supersede local planning, unless there has been thorough consultation with local planners, and those changes are consistent with the context of the residential area in question. Read more

Comment ID

81119

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am very much opposed to section 019-6163 of bill 23 since it allows development to take place in protected areas of Ontario and places a greater burden on taxpayers instead of the developers who are profiting from the destruction of these valuable lands.

Comment ID

81128

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Apparently there is an abundance of unused land within the City of Toronto and GTA that should be developed for affordable housing. Immigrants to this country need to live close to sources of employment. Whether renting or buying, prices need to come down. Read more

Comment ID

81138

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Ontario’s Greenbelt was designated and protected in 2005. There was a reason for this… Urban sprawl can grow unchecked without regulation, destroying ecosystem services we need for a healthy environment. It was recognized that Read more

Comment ID

81149

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It seems that the various bills and changes to acts are trying to transfer risk from private developers to the public. The public DOES NOT not agree with this premise and so many aspects of the bills and changes! Read more

Comment ID

81166

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Removing the planning policy and approval responsibilities from certain upper-tier municipalities (regions of Durham, Halton, Niagara, Peel, Simcoe, Waterloo, York) is not acceptable! Wow! What kind of dictatorship has this government become! Read more

Comment ID

81174

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It is vital to maintain and seek the input of Conservation Authorities. Diminishing their role is done at our collective peril. CA staff has specific expertise and knowledge which urban planning staff don't have. Their input in planning is vital. It is not "red tape" or "a barrier." Read more

Comment ID

81175

Commenting on behalf of

Emery Village Business Improvement Area

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Proposed Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act Changes (Schedules 9 and 1 of Bill 23- the proposed More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022) ERO number: 019-6163 Read more

Comment ID

81185

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Given that there are issues of transparency being looked into by the Integrity Commissioner, please delay the implementation of this More Homes Built Faster Act, until after a report is delivered. Read more

Comment ID

81189

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This proposal is very concerning. As a resident of Durham region I am appalled to hear that you want to remove the planning policy and approval responsibilities from my municipality. Read more

Comment ID

81190

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This proposed legislation is absurd and and will take Ontario back to the dark ages in terms of planning decisions and process. It takes away most of the current checks and balances and removes municipally elected officials from having influence in their own communities. Read more

Comment ID

81192

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please reject the changes to the Planning Act, the City of Toronto Act, and repeal all of the dreadful Bill 23 - it is not in the best public interest and will not build more homes - or faster either. Read more

Comment ID

81201

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Removing the ability for municipalities to regulate architectural details and landscape design is dangerous and allows house developers to maximize the number of houses in an area with no regard to how people will live in these spaces in a social context and with no regard for their overall well-bei Read more