Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

72945

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is an abuse of power ... it is not solving the problem that you are pretending to address. You are destroying habitat, the ecosystem, our heritage, and you are creating nothing from it except massive tracts of housing that still the people who need housing cannot afford. Read more

Comment ID

72970

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The following is a summary of the comments made on behalf of The Governing Council of the University of Toronto (“the University”), please review our attached letter for further details: Read more

Comment ID

72990

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I do not want changes to any heritage act or designation. Also very concerned about this government’s developing green space and previously protected marshes, woodlots, environmentally Y sensitive areas as newly announced

Comment ID

73023

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Proposed Changes to the Ontario Heritage Act and its regulations: Bill 23 (Schedule 6) - the Proposed More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 Under "Proposal details" in the ERO posting there's a subsection entitled Read more

Comment ID

73030

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I would like to express my concerns about Bill 23. I support the objections to the Bill put forward by the City of Toronto and the Bruce Trail Conservancy. Read more

Comment ID

73037

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Throughout sustainability, Bill 23 is not an effective representative of our country. It is vital that wetlands are protected through economic development and growth. Not only will economic development be affected but housing and climate change will be unfairly implemented as well. Read more

Comment ID

73038

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am extremely concerned about Bill 23. While I absolutely agree that more homes are needed, I believe this bill will cause as many problems as it purports to want to solve. It will worsen climate change by destroying carbon sinks like forests, wetlands and grasslands. Read more

Comment ID

73054

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As an emerging professional who has studied and worked in the field of heritage conservation over the past decade, I respectfully submit my objection to the proposed changes to the Ontario Heritage Act as part of Bill 23. Read more

Comment ID

73061

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
According to what I've read, bill 23 appears to be primarily focused on economic gain while mostly ignoring the community and environmental effects. Read more

Comment ID

73063

Commenting on behalf of

Architectural Conservancy of Ontario, Prince Edward County branch

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Bill 23’s changes to the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA) will be a giant step backward for the conservation of cultural heritage in Ontario. Read more

Comment ID

73068

Commenting on behalf of

Private Consultancy

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
--Following text is verbatim the PDF file uploaded-- Proposed Changes to the Ontario Heritage Act and its regulations: Bill 23 (Schedule 6) - the Proposed More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 Comments Submitted to the Environmental Registry of Ontario Read more

Comment ID

73082

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am deeply saddened by this proposal. We moved to Northumberland County because of the beautiful rolling hills and the spectacular heritage homes. To replace these with new builds would destroy the charm of this unique and special place.

Comment ID

73123

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The end does not justify the means outlined in this proposal. The changes proposed in this document are apparent in their goals, which are to facilitate the development of a greater supply of housing, and to concentrate power in order to do so. Read more

Comment ID

73142

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am a property owner and resident of Saugeen Shores/Southampton and a member of the Bruce Trail Conservancy. I strongly object to Bill 23 and it’s failure to protect the greenbelt from development and to protect our heritage buildings from demolition. Read more

Comment ID

73148

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I don't know a great deal about Heritage in Ontario but I do understand a few things that Bill 23 may unintentionally harm in its rush to force municipalities to "designate or un-list." Tourism in Ontario and the economic benefits it bring to (especially smaller communities) will be harmed by this b Read more

Comment ID

73172

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Stop this bill at all costs. Protect the green belt. Housing intensification in GTA but not i. The green belt. The green belt is our common heritage and all we have left.

Comment ID

73221

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am deeply saddened by bill 23. Why are we selling off protected greenspace and heritage land? It's detrimental to the country as a whole. How can we be independent as a country if we can no longer farm our own food? Or if we have flooding due to the lack of forests? Read more