Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

74484

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It is greatly concerning that this legislation was put into place that has a clear connection to PC party donors. The corruption associated with this legislation will forever stain Ontario, and will put municipalities at financial risk, and Ontarians at risk of further homelessness. Read more

Comment ID

74485

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Not only are our green lands important and should be protected, but spreading housing across more land will only hurt the walkability of already car dependant suburbs. We should be building upwards, not outwards, and focusing on good urban planning over the development of precious natural land. Read more

Comment ID

74487

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Build affordable mid density housing on or close to existing public transit nodes. Keep farmland available for feeding expected increase in population. With climate and water issues in California we must protect and support our own local food supply.

Comment ID

74491

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
(1) You are enriching developers on the backs of current homeowners. Passing development costs along by forcing municipalities to raise property taxes is wrong. Your government has declared war on homeowners and this is a fight that your government will not win. Read more

Comment ID

74494

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Why are comment open until December 4th but the bill was passed November 24th? This bill does not serve the people! Developer fees are in place to pay for the infrastructure required for further developments. Why are tax payers paying this fee while developers make all the money?

Comment ID

74502

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
A range of concerns arise from the government's decision to develop the Greenbelt for housing: Firstly, debate in the provincial leslgislature has been cut short on the bill, an afront to democracy. There are legitimate questions around backroom dealings with developers. Read more

Comment ID

74503

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I think you know EXACTLY how most of us feel about you developing the Green Belt. We made it very clear while you were running for office. You said "the people have spoken, we have listened, we will not touch the Green Belt". Remember that? Read more

Comment ID

74504

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I'm greatly disappointed in Ontario's plan to bulldoze through our Greenbelt to benefit developers at the cost of our environment and planet. Urban sprawl is not the answer to our housing crisis and we need to modernize our existing city boundaries with higher density housing and improved transit.

Comment ID

74509

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Although I doubt this comment will change anything, as the government has already made its mind up, but I am a Conservative voter who absolutely condemns Bill C23 and the removal of Greenbelt land. How is it protected land if you are just going to reassign it? Read more