Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

79039

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am appalled by the proposed amendments to the Greenbelt plan. There is ample land already approved for development in the vicinity of the Greenbelt. The government should be trying to get developers to build on this land that is already approved, not reducing the amount of protected land.

Comment ID

79042

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There is no way the greenbelt can be "moved" let alone in that short a period of time. There is plenty of room for expansion of homes WITHOUT compromising the greenbelt. There has never been a greenbelt "proposal" that has worked. You cannot rewire wildlife to understand their home has moved. Read more

Comment ID

79044

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Ford and Clark, YOU LIED TO US. You squeezed in another term based on lies about NEVER touching the Greenbelt, and here you are going back on your word. The Greenbelt, wetlands, environmentally protected lands, wildlife and Oak Ridges Moraine are not yours to touch!!! Read more

Comment ID

79046

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I have many questions that I would like to hear answers on: What is the point of having a greenbelt, if the plan is to develop it whenever we feel like it? I thought the long range plan to deal with population growth was to build up not out? Why has this changed? Read more

Comment ID

79047

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please backtrack on the proposed development on the Greenbelt. It will cause damage that cannot be undone. There is no question there is a housing crisis, but this is not the answer. If the current government was transparent, they would admit that housing is not their concern. Money is. Read more

Comment ID

79048

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Houses going up in the greenbelt will not be "affordable" housing, but yet more sprawling subdivisions without walkable services like variety stores, banks, post offices, clinics, etc. This is a disgusting piece of legislation which address the real housing crises in name only. Read more

Comment ID

79061

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There is a shortage of trades. Your act means houses built quickly and on the cheap by unqualified workers in environmentally sensitive areas. These houses will be garbage in no time - 10-15 years and the damage will have been done to the environments they were built in. Read more