Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

64234

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It is an absolute travesty and completely unacceptable to re-designate protected lands for development. There are plenty of other options in terms of building affordable and eco-friendly homes that does not include destroying protected lands. Read more

Comment ID

64236

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Hey Doug, I do not support the destruction of the green belt. You could try a little harder to hide your complete disinterest in the well being of future generations in this province. To claim the destruction of this land will benefit anyone but the developers involved is ludicrous. Read more

Comment ID

64243

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
No. Just no. No more highways. No more subdivisions. They're all the same. The houses are all the same. Cheap. Easy to build. Profitable for the builder. Driveways, grass, central heating, central a/c. Large. If you wanted to invent a housing system that killed the planet, this would be it. Read more

Comment ID

64248

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am very disappointed in this Government's insistence to tear apart the environment. We have a greenbelt that was created to help preserve green space and important environmental sensitive and agricultural lands. We do not need to take away from this protected country side to build houses. Read more

Comment ID

64250

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I do not support any removal of Greenbelt land for development, including housing. Urban sprawl is not the way forward to adding homes in Ontario. We don't need more suburbs. We need to add density and services to support that density in our cities. Read more

Comment ID

64252

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The future isn't urban sprawl. It's not the car. It's not fossil fuels. So therefore intensification is what the government of Ontario should be pushing. Not further degradation our untouched spaces. There is already plenty of developed land in which more people can be added. Read more