Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

64446

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Destroying farmland, wet lands and watershed areas is a bad idea. That I am sure you do not care about since the goal is to further enrich select individuals that finance the political system for personal benefits. An example of this is the land that was purchased near the proposed highway 413. Read more

Comment ID

64448

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The housing crisis should not take precedent over our environment. We shouldn’t threaten the carrying capacity of our environment. The green belt act was established for the purpose of protecting vital ecosystems and curbing urban sprawl. Read more

Comment ID

64450

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Densify what we have now. Your own report says that we have more than enough land to not need to use the greenbelt. "But a shortage of land isn’t the cause of the problem. Land is available, both inside the existing built-up areas and on undeveloped land outside greenbelts." Read more

Comment ID

64451

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We should not be developing parts of the greenbelt and risking irreparable damage to both the environment and wetlands. There are better methods of development focused on urban densification and appropriate usage of area already available to developers. Read more

Comment ID

64456

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I'm very concerned about expanding urban boundaries at the expense of protected land. If there is a corresponding push away from single family homes and further densification with proper public transit, trains, etc then perhaps this is acceptable. Without the overall picture I cannot support

Comment ID

64458

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Do not build on the green belt. Do not destroy the ecosystems that support the longevity of our province. Any construction or destruction of this protected land will be catastrophic to wildlife, trees that keep our air clean, clean waterways, and generations of farmland. Read more

Comment ID

64461

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Greenbelt is beyond important. Supports biodiversity , helps control flood areas, protect our water tables, creates areas for everyone to enjoy, houses important sensitive ecosystems, and much more. Housing is needed but not there. We do not need more sprawling suburbs, dependent on cars. Read more