Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

64523

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Housing development should not come at the expense of green building standards or the protected Greenbelt. This response to the housing crisis is extremely short-sighted. Cheap housing and threatening Ontario's ecosystems will only introduce more issues in the future.

Comment ID

64527

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I can't trust you at all to keep your word on saving our farms Build further north on less arable land and provide incentives for everyone to locate there It can be done And new highway traffic can be on non destroyed farmland Be creative with design ideas and development strategies Read more

Comment ID

64529

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Greenbelt is an important part of our province and should not be destroyed to increase developer profits. Densification in existing neighbourhoods can occur without harming this precious region. The housing crisis does not need to be addressed by destroying our environment.

Comment ID

64532

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The greenbelt as it is currently mapped allows green space and environmental diversity in areas of high density or future high density neighbourhoods. Changing these designations is not going to allow the residents of these communities to have green space in their neighbourhoods. Read more

Comment ID

64534

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The land was set aside for a reason. How are we going to feed more people if you keep paving over farmland. Density the land you have. Build family size units in condo towers instead of building out. No point in housing more people if we can't feed them. Read more

Comment ID

64541

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The first thought to come to mind just form looking at the title of this proposal is that the Greenbelt is supposed to be protected natural landscape in a part of our province which is already quite developed; whether that be urban, suburban, or farmland/countryside. Read more