Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

92647

Commenting on behalf of

S. C. Johnson & Son, Limited

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
S. C. Johnson & Son, Limited (SC Johnson) is pleased to submit these comments addressing select provisions in the Proposed 2023 Provincial Planning Statement (PPS). Thank you in advance for your consideration. We are pleased to respond to any questions. Read more

Comment ID

92648

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Studies have made it absolutely clear that any development of the formerly protected lands of the Greenbelt is unnecessary. "There is enough land available to build over 2 million homes in the Greater Golden Horseshoe by 2031, without touching the Greenbelt or expanding urban boundaries." Read more

Comment ID

92649

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Do not break up farms...subdividing each farm into 3 main lots to provide 12 homes! How foolish! Yes there is a housing crisis, but does the government not understand we have a FOOD CRISIS. We need every acre of land to produce local food. Read more

Comment ID

92650

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please update Section 2.9 on “Energy Conservation, Air Quality and Climate Change” to clearly mention that maintaining, retrofitting and adaptively-reusing existing buildings and structures is a good way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and prepare for the impacts of a changing climate. Read more

Comment ID

92651

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Rural areas expansion on prime agricultural land in municpalities (hamlets): before developement and expansion on prime agricultural land, it should be demonstrated that there is a need and requirement for additional building lots within the municipality. Read more

Comment ID

92652

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I think it is disgraceful to have the largest industrial zoned area in Ontario broken up and used for housing. The businesses on the industrial land made the decision to locate there because it was zoned industrial, these are billion dollar decision. Read more

Comment ID

92653

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The creation of residential lots on prime Agriculture designated lands seriously jeopardizes the viability of Ontario's Agriculture and Agri-Food Sector. To allow up to 3 residential lots in prime Agricultural areas is preposterous ! Read more

Comment ID

92654

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There is no doubt that the provision of more housing, especially affordable housing, in growing regions of Ontario is important and it's good that this government recognizes that and is motivated to do something about it. Read more

Comment ID

92657

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I live in a small rural community west of Kitchener. We are surrounded by farmland which is used for crops that feed people and animals. We cannot afford to pave over farmland with boxy houses or estate homes....keep those to the city limits. Read more

Comment ID

92658

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As a farmer whose family has farmed the same farm in Caledon for 150 years, I am supportive of the proposed policies to form a new provincial planning policy instrument. I disagree with those who have concerns with the loss of farmland as well as those who are concerned with food security. Read more

Comment ID

92660

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please consider removing the protected industrial barrier around the Nanticoke area. As a resident who has watched this area remain underdeveloped please allow it to be considered for rezoning. We are naive to believe that our industrial partners will remain here indefinitely. Read more

Comment ID

92661

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Dear Minister Clark, I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed changes found in the proposed Provincial Policy Statement, 2023 (PPS 2023). Specifically, I am concerned about the impact the proposed policies will have on agricultural lands in the province. Read more

Comment ID

92662

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I do like the ability of the municipalities to have the control over housing allowing them to use infill and higher density within the borders of the boundaries already existing. Read more

Comment ID

92663

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
My husband and I are opposed to allowing industrial lands be rezoned for housing next door to s telco steel plant. We live near that area and are opposed especially with Hwy 6 traffic through Jarvis too much now without adding 40,000 new homes.

Comment ID

92664

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I would like to make a few comments concerning the MMHA proposal in regards to Indigenous engagement, the importance of archaeological sites, and the possibilities of protective mandates when dealing with First Nations heritage. Read more

Comment ID

92665

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am responding to ERO 019-6813 to express my opposition to this proposal to replace the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan) with a new Provincial Planning Statement. Read more

Comment ID

92670

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Submission ERO-019-6813 Proposed Policies adapted from A Place to Grow and Provincial Policy Statement to form a new provincial planning statement In response to the request for comments on this proposal, I do not support the elimination of Read more