Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

95779

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Biglieri Group Ltd. (“TBG”) represents Nova Construction Company Ltd., the owner of 1.14 hectares of land municipally known as 1530-1536 Midland Avenue (“Subject Site” or “Site”). In 2021 TBG submitted a request for an Employment Land Conversion (“ELC”) on the Subject Site Read more

Comment ID

95799

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
On behalf of 2130254 Ontario Inc., the owner of 51 Manstor Road, Toronto, we are attaching a submission letter dated January 18, 2024, together with a Planning Justification Report prepared by Humphries Planning Group Inc., a Compatibility and Mitigation Study prepared by SLR Consulting (Canada) Ltd Read more

Comment ID

96013

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We are the lawyers for The Governing Council of the University of Toronto. We are writing on behalf of the University in respect of the City of Toronto’s OPA 644 which, as adopted, permitted limited conversions of employment lands in Toronto. Read more

Comment ID

96036

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please find attached letter with comments on City of Toronto Official Plan Amendment No. 644, prepared by North American Development Group with regards to their site at 3125-3390 Steeles Avenue East and 4000 Victoria Park Avenue. Read more

Comment ID

96054

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
In our opinion, the redesignation of the subject site (1681-1725 Eglinton Avenue East, 20-32 Mobile Drive, 1 Credit Union Drive, Conversion Request 105) from Core Employment Areas and General Employment Areas to Mixed Use Areas would be appropriate in land use planning terms. Read more

Comment ID

96072

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Earlier today, I submitted a comment (Comment ID 96047) on this posting respecting 33 Green Belt Drive. A planning opinion from Bousfields was attached. Unfortunately, the version that was filed was missing certain appended items. Read more