Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

185832

Commenting on behalf of

Town of Aylmer

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Permitting privately owned publicly accessible spaces and other non-traditional forms of parkland dedication may require more complex legal agreements and increased staff resources to review and administer these arrangements. Read more

Comment ID

185869

Commenting on behalf of

The Corporation of the County of Brant

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this posting. The County of Brant provides the following commentary and refers the Province to the Council-approved staff report for additional context (RPT-0159-26). Read more

Comment ID

185912

Commenting on behalf of

City of Markham

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
1) Standardizing of Parkland Requirements – Staff are not supportive of requiring municipalities to accept encumbered lands and privately owned publicly accessible spaces (POPS) as part of parkland dedication. Read more

Comment ID

185940

Commenting on behalf of

Durham Region Homebuilders' Association

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
On behalf of the Durham Region Home Builders’ Association (DRHBA), thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed regulatory changes regarding developer-identified parkland through ERO 026-0312: Proposed Changes to Support Standardizing of Parkland Dedication Requirements. Read more

Comment ID

185992

Commenting on behalf of

City of Burlington

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
To Whom It May Concern: Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on ERO posting 026-0312. Please see attached an electronic submission from the City of Burlington. Below are the key points extracted from the submission, c/o of City's Public Works Department. Read more

Comment ID

186008

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please see the attached letter and detailed comments chart as it concerns the proposed changes to parkland dedication in Section 42 of the Planning Act and associated regulations. (ERO: 026-0312) Read more