As a family physician who…

As a family physician who values a healthy ecology and recognizes its profound impact on human health, I am deeply concerned about the implications of Bill 5 as proposed. This legislation appears to prioritize short-term economic development over long-term environmental sustainability, which directly threatens public health and well-being.

Allowing the designation of “special economic zones” with minimal regard for existing laws could lead to unchecked development that damages natural ecosystems, pollutes air and water sources, and accelerates habitat destruction. The exemption from archaeological assessments and the repeal of the Endangered Species Act undermine crucial protections for wildlife and biodiversity, including migratory birds and their habitats—integral components of a healthy environment.

Furthermore, terminating comprehensive environmental assessments deprives decision-makers and the public of essential information about environmental and socio-economic impacts. This lack of oversight can result in environmental degradation that ultimately harms human health, increasing risks of respiratory illnesses, waterborne diseases, and other health issues associated with ecological harm.

From a health perspective, safeguarding ecosystems is fundamental. Biodiversity and healthy habitats support clean air and water, regulate climate, and contribute to mental and physical well-being. I urge policymakers to reconsider this legislation and prioritize environmental protections that support the health of both ecosystems and the people who depend on them. Protecting our natural environment is not just an ethical obligation but a vital investment in the health and resilience of our communities.