Totally a biased decision by…

Totally a biased decision by the MNR to omit WMU 91 & 92. There is no biological reason, or logistical
reason for this decision. It was confirmed by your administration that the MNR took direction on the advice of a self appointed special interest group( Aylmer Stakeholders) that does not represent the voices of hunters in these zones, the MNR should be held accountable for their actions. No one replies to questions as to why this area was omitted. This group participates in the CDH and are looking out for their own interest. An internal investigation should he held and those responsible should be removed. What kind of provincial government agency takes advice from a special interest group that is "Self appointed"?. This decision shows Prejudice and conflict of Interest