I am writing to express my…

I am writing to express my deep concern and strong opposition to Bill 212, Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024. The proposed framework within this bill to grant provincial veto power over bike lanes, particularly when their installation removes a vehicle lane, undermines key values of equitable transportation, public health, and environmental sustainability. This legislation poses a significant threat to urban mobility and ignores the growing need for alternative, sustainable transportation infrastructure.

Bike lanes serve as more than just an avenue for cyclists—they are a means to promote cleaner air, reduce congestion, and offer a healthy, affordable transportation option for residents of all socioeconomic backgrounds. By discouraging the development of such infrastructure, Bill 212 runs counter to the global push toward greener, more livable cities. In fact, reducing reliance on cars and enhancing bicycle infrastructure directly addresses the traffic gridlock the bill purports to solve.

Removing bike lanes on arterial roads like Bloor, University, or Yonge Streets would have devastating consequences, reversing the progress made in cities like Toronto to foster safe, accessible transportation options for all. These streets, and others like them, should be spaces where different forms of mobility—cars, bicycles, and pedestrians—can coexist, promoting a healthy balance of transportation modes. To suggest that a return to prioritizing car traffic over active transportation is necessary for city function is both shortsighted and harmful.

Moreover, Bill 212's emphasis on accelerating highway projects and easing environmental assessments not only sidesteps critical oversight but also exacerbates issues related to climate change. Transportation accounts for a significant portion of Ontario's greenhouse gas emissions, and expanding highway infrastructure while limiting active transportation options will only deepen the province's carbon footprint.

The future of urban transportation lies in encouraging diverse forms of mobility—not just private vehicles. Bike lanes contribute to a safer, healthier, and more connected community. Rather than restricting their development, the Ontario government should be working collaboratively with municipalities to expand bike-friendly infrastructure and invest in modern, inclusive transportation systems.

I strongly urge you to reconsider Bill 212 and its detrimental impacts on sustainable transportation, health, and the environment. The equitable, forward-thinking path is to support and expand cycling infrastructure across Ontario—not to undermine it.