I doubt that the bicycle…

I doubt that the bicycle path would warrant the expense. We frequently attend church at Bloor and Windermere. We leave our house near Bloor and Tomken at 10 am and return at noon. On two Sundays in March when the weather was sunny, we counted cyclists to and from chiurch. On neither Sunday was there a single cyclist using Bloor Street. Rather than forsaking two traffic lanes for cycle paths, I am astonished that the cycle paths were not proposed for the ample boulevards on either side of Boor Street. The cost would be much less than tearing up the existing pavement and just paving two paths for cyclists on the boulevards on either side of the existing Bloor Street.

So I'm against the current proposal because the potential cycle usage does not warrant the cost to provide it and because reasonable steps were not taken to provide it as economically as possible