Commentaire
I am writing to express my strong opposition to Schedule 5 of Bill 60, which proposes amendments to the Highway Traffic Act (HTA) that would prohibit municipalities from reducing motor vehicle lanes when installing, implementing, or marking new bicycle lanes.
I am a resident who was born and raised in Oakville and bikes for transportation. I believe that the changes to the HTA proposed in Schedule 5 undermine equity, community, and sustainability. I also believe this proposed change undermines the agency of local governments to determine what road solutions are best for their community. This change would be a massive overstep of government control with no conceivable improvements in safety.
I have witnessed deadly incidents in Oakville, particularly the Trafalgar/QEW overpass. As an Ontario (OGS) and Canadian Graduate Scholarship (CGSM) recipient researching commuting practices in Ontario, I can tell you that there are people in EVERY community that bike, drive, walk, bus, etc. to work, to get groceries, to pick up their children from school.
This Bill will not provide people the means or desire to drive if they are without. They will be on the road on their bikes or walking across an overpass, the only difference is that these community-members are much more vulnerable without safe infrastructure. It is disgusting to prioritize "faster" roads for drivers (bike lanes and reducing car lanes has been proven not to slow car traffic) over the lives of our friends, family and neighbors.
Cycling is not a luxury—it is a necessity. It is a low-cost, low-carbon, health-promoting mode of transportation that should be accessible to all. The amendments proposed in Schedule 5 would restrict municipalities from making locally-informed decisions that prioritize safety, climate action, and inclusive mobility. They would also centralize authority in a manner that limits community-driven planning and responsiveness to local needs.
Diverse roadways work better. The proposed changes to the HTA also appear to threaten other uses of public road space that communities across the province are increasingly relying on. These include public transit priority lanes, curbside access space, pedestrian-first crossings, seating patios, and school streets. The insistence on maintaining and/or adding lanes for motor vehicles on public roadways tends to worsen traffic congestion, not reduce it—your government’s own experts have consistently found that bicycle lanes, for example, are not a cause of gridlock and that rapid transit bus lanes, for example, move more people per hour by comparison even when appearing less busy. Induced demand is a phenomenon of car-centrism time and again in cities across Ontario. Perpetuating these problems is not the way forward.
I am particularly concerned that:
The prohibition on lane reductions removes a key tool for creating safe, separated cycling infrastructure.
The regulation-making powers granted to the provincial government could further erode municipal autonomy and transparency.
The changes to reimbursement discretion may discourage municipalities from pursuing cycling improvements altogether.
The proposed amendments in question run counter to Ontario’s stated goals around climate resilience, public health, and active transportation. They also threaten to stall progress in cities like London, where cycling is being embraced as a practical, joyful, and sustainable way to move about. Removing bicycle lanes—as attempted by Bill 212 in 2024—or preventing them from being built—as proposed by Bill 60 now—makes public roadways more dangerous. Protected bicycle lanes especially reduce serious injuries and deaths for people cycling, walking, and driving, as they help in properly siloing road users by their modes.
I urge the Government of Ontario to withdraw Schedule 5 from Bill 60. Instead, provincial administrators should work collaboratively with municipalities, advocacy groups, and residents like myself to support Vision Zero streets and more equitable transportation choices.
Kind regards,
Blair Kingdon
Resident of 1280 Hillview Cres., Oakville, ON
Soumis le 17 novembre 2025 1:40 PM
Commentaire sur
Projet de loi 60 – Loi de 2025 visant à lutter contre les retards et à construire plus rapidement – Transport moderne – Interdire la réduction des voies des véhicules pour les nouvelles pistes cyclables
Numéro du REO
025-1071
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
171968
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire