Resubmitting due to previous…

Resubmitting due to previous IT glitch) Is . According to Riverstone, the surrounding wetlands and forests are ‘of conservation interest for which negative impacts stemming from implementation of the proposed development plan are ‘possible’. Given the documented ecological diversity of this wetland and the risks identified by consultants hired by Fowler, how can the proposed quarry expansion be allowed to proceed? In closing, I beg of you to please consider not allowing Fowler to proceed with their proposed plans. There is a substantial amount of aggregate in less populated areas located conveniently off major highways. Our area has become more populated since Fowler was granted their license more than 30 years. The ethical and financial benefits of adhering to the wishes of the local residents will reap great rewards for generations to come. Thank You.