Commentaire
This proposal has many great new elements within, but why on earth have WMUs 91 & 92 been left out from amendment #2????
There is absolutely no justifiable reason to leave 91/92 out from enjoying the benefits of this proposal and this proposal should not love forward until we are included!!!!!!!
The fact that 91 & 92 were left out from the time of the initial proposal raises numerous red flags to me as to why, and who was advocating on my behalf for the exclusion. I am a land steward, hunter and land owner in 92 and have not elected any stakeholder groups to represent my voice, which makes me wonder who is privy to influence the MNRF in a such a way that I am left out of this "simplification and alignment" and its intended benefits. Not cool.
Add 91/92 to this proposal and clean up the status quo of self-interested groups advocating to exclude me from this proposal!!!
Soumis le 17 décembre 2021 10:54 AM
Commentaire sur
Proposition visant à simplifier et à harmoniser les saisons de chasse au cerf de Virginie dans la province
Numéro du REO
019-4637
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
59069
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire