Comments re: Bill 23 &the…

Numéro du REO

019-6216

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72787

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire

Comments re: Bill 23 &the Greenbelt Plan

The Greenbelt Act was created to preserve environmentally sensitive lands in the Greater Toronto Area, protecting them from urban development.

I am concerned the Ontario government's More Homes Built Faster plan proposes to allow construction of low-density housing on parts of these protected lands, trading them away for land that's less ecologically significant, less desirable and less valuable.

Once these sensitive lands are developed/destroyed unnecessarily. they can never be returned to their original state. Thinking they can be replaced in some other area is ludicrous. You cannot recreate what nature has gifted us.

Mr. Ford previously committed to not touching the Greenbelt. Where is that commitment now? What are we to believe of our government and their leaders.

Below, is a more detailed list and supporting text on my concerns.

My Concerns and Related Requests and Recommendations
1. Do your Due Diligence: Take the time to do this work. Do not pass Bill 23 or support the Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan until proper consultation is completed with affected stakeholders, key interest groups including Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO), the Ontario Chamber of Commerce, Conservation Authorities (CA), OFA and affordable housing advocates. The housing rationale used for these measures must be demonstrated to be sound; to date the measures proposed are not supported by planners, municipalities or housing advocates.

2. Allow Conservation Authorities to maintain their current role in permitting in regulated areas, allow them to conserve land, reduce pollution via land use planning review and permits. Don’t further consider land owned by CA’s for housing development. Uphold the purpose and rationale for CA’s, namely preservation, conservation and stewardship of land with natural hazard risks.

3. Require a full Environmental Assessment for the Duffins York-Durham Sewage System servicing northern York Region.

4. Abandon the abolition of Regional Planning: There are issues with regional planning, but the only support for the proposal to eliminate the important coordinating role of regional government, particularly for infrastructure planning, is from land speculators and developers. If there’s a rationale for the government’s proposal that serves the public interest, please provide.

5. Do not encroach on the Greenbelt and Oak Ridges Moraine: There’s enough land to build the housing that Ontario needs for 30 years. Even BILD has said they don’t need Greenbelt. This file stinks; any self-respecting MPP or Councillor should immediately distance themselves from these hand-picked, unjustifiable Greenbelt land removals.

6. Protect Wetlands, Natural Heritage, Species at Risk and Ontario from the inevitable risks of Climate Change! It is unfathomable that we even need to say this. Southern Ontario is an “ecoregion in crisis”. Removing more natural features here and adding protections to lands elsewhere obviously isn’t going to improve our ecoregion. Do not change the OWES wetland evaluation system. Maintain strong prohibitions on alteration of landscape in Ontario’s Natural Heritage System (NHS) and its features in the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS). Do not allow offsets, trades, or “compensation” agreements. Capitalize on the free service provided via natural asset management instead of infrastructure and capital intensive engineered solutions.

7. Allow Members of the Public and CA to appeal Official Plan, Zoning Bylaw Amendments and Sprawl Proposals to the Ontario Lands Tribunal. Make the playing field level once more by providing the same rights to both project proponents and community players interested in challenging and/or improving planning proposals/Official Plans. Consider threshold levels to reduce appeals abusing the process. When last I looked we live in a Democratic Province and Country. This plan to deny appeals of any kind LET ALONE TAXPAYERS is not Demoncratic!!

8. Do not override Official Plans. For better or worse they are far more democratic than the proposals flowing out of the government of Ontario at this time. They have done the work!! The due diligence, the balance, met previous provincial guidelines.

9. Maintain the PPS & Growth Plan, its density requirements, and support rational infrastructure phasing policies to make the best use of limited taxpayer and developer dollars.

10. Communicate HONESTLY Now to ALL your constituents that the cost of these ill-conceived plans are going to fall upon taxpayers. Be it developer costs being waived or trying to recoup the destroyed environment—the taxpayer will have to absorb it.

My concerns are validated by many organizations who have submitted facts and issues, including Ecojustice, Narwahl , Environmental Defence, and many many more.