Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19680

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Much more detailed info is needed regarding planning tools available to municipalities. We are not in favour of any part of Bill 66. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19684

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There should be no development on the Greenbelt. There are currently no municipal services or infrastructure on the Greenbelt such as sewers, roads, internet, or garbage pick-up. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19691

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly oppose Bill 66. Please consider alternative programs to incentivize businesses to establish in Ontario. Opening up Ontario's natural and agricultural resources is shortsighted and dangerous to our near future health and financial sustainability.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19737

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Nature

Statut du commentaire

Ken Petersen Manager Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing Local Government and Planning Policy Division Provincial Planning Policy Branch 777 Bay Street Floor 13 Toronto ON M5G 2E5 Dear Mr. Petersen, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19773

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

1.Concerned about public consultation prior to approvals left to discretion of municipality. All applications to be posted for public review pls. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19785

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

By eliminating the Toxics Reduction Act and allowing for development under Schedule 10 of Bill 66 that ignores important environmental measures, these proposals eliminate the regulations that are meant to protect the very people whom these government claims to be “for”. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19793

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

My comment is contained in the attachment below - "Bill 66 Comments". Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19807

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Do not endanger regulations and laws protecting Ontario's natural areas, farmlands, drinking water and our protection from toxic chemicals. There is no business development that could possibly justify putting any of these systems at risk. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19822

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am wholeheartedly in opposition to the passage of Schedule 10 in Bill 66. Passage of this bill: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19845

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not want Bill 66 to remove the protection of the Planning Act and Provincial Policy Statements for significant built heritage resources and significant cultural landscapes anywhere in the province.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19870

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Open for business planning by-laws could pose serious risks to our heritage buildings and other cultural heritage resources. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19912

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am deeply concerned that waterways, farmlands, and natural lands are threatened by development and environmental deregulation. This is not a constructive, healthy direction for our province. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19937

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I would like to respectfully submit my clear opposition to bill 66 section 10, which could override parts of the Greenbelt Act and various other environmental protection acts. Thank you.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19950

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is a bad bill. It is bad for workers, it is terrible for the environment, and it is being pushed through without adequate transparency. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19957

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to you to ask that you keep your promise to protect the Greenbelt and therefore call back legislature and introduce a new Bill 66 that stops the attacks on the Greenbelt, Oak Ridges Moraine, Lake Simcoe, Source Water Protection Areas and other important protected farm and natural areas Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19963

Commentaire fait au nom

Tay Valley Township

Statut du commentaire

The Council of the Corporation of Tay Valley Township passed the following motion directing staff to express Council’s concerns with Bill 66, Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19965

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing because I am opposed to “Bill 66, Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act, 2018” along with the proposed regulations associated with the “Open-for-business planning tool” My expertise is in archaeology and cultural heritage management and these proposals could negatively, and dramatical Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19993

Commentaire fait au nom

Conservation Ontario

Statut du commentaire

Please see the attached document which outlines Conservation Ontario's comments on the proposed Bill 66, Restoring Ontario's Competitiveness Act (EBR#013-4293), the Proposed Open-for-business Planning Tool (EBR#013-4125), and the proposed New Regulation under the Planning Act for open-for-business p Lire davantage