Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

26987

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Do not change the legislation Natural species are already in decline due to human intervention and you will make it worse

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

26988

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

DO NOT MAKE THESE CHANGES!!!! You are jeopardizing all species and plant life and your proposed changes will make Ontario "open for destruction", not just open for business! How dare you make cuts to our environmental protection systems for our species! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

26989

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

When will we put the health of our planet before financial gain? I am not in favour of suspending species and their habitats when it's inconvenient, or allowing developers to pay to avoid regulations. No one should be above regulations!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

26990

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

On behalf of LACC (Limerick Area Conservation Coalition), WE IMPLORE YOU, DO TO NOT MAKE ANY CHANGES TO THE SPECIES AT RISK LEGISLATION!!!! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

26995

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Just as I value the Greenbelt, I value endangered species. I do not believe developers' interests come before that of the environment and the world my children inherit. Once those species are gone, they are gone. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

26998

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposed change to allow developers to pay a fee to ignore regulations would be foolish and incredibly short-sighted, and only shows the people of Ontario that the current government either does not understand how important our environment is, or they do not care.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

26999

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not agree with the proposed changes. I believe other relevant environmental groups should be consulted. After researching the David Suzuki foundation, I would state that the proposed policies: - Species listed as threatened or endangered may no longer be automatically protected Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

27004

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This seems like a step backward for Ontario if anything... deadlines need to be kept shorter. People on the committee should be scientists only.. professionals who understand the risks of changing our biodiversity.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

27005

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Thank you for finally bring the ESA, SRA under control. The MNRF have been abusing this act and using it to enforce there personnel views and interpretations of the act. They have been using their power of enforcement to bully and intimidate the public and land owners. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

27007

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The protection for species at risk should be administered at arm's length from any government minister or ministry. Possibly by a group of university departments in conjunction with input from environmental groups. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

27010

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

"The proposed changes would authorize the creation of a regulatory charge that could be paid by persons who are permitted to carry out otherwise prohibited activities under certain permits, agreements, and regulations. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

27015

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I have heard that the proposed changes will include: - Species listed as threatened or endangered may no longer be automatically protected Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

27018

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I DO NOT support the proposed changes to the Ont. ESA. What is particularly upsetting to the ESA in my opinion falls under Chapter 4. Issuing Endangered Species Act permits and agreements and developing regulatory exemptions. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

27020

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

These are dangerous and regressive laws, both from a scientific and ethical standpoint. To reduce protections on endangered species in the midst of species disappearing at an already alarming rate is, to understate it, concerning. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

27021

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I find it totally irresponsible that this government would allow developer's (and similar greedy speculation) to be enabled to buy their way towards exemption from any existing Endangered Species Act provisions for the protection of such. Shame on you! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

27023

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

My comment is simple - amending the act under the guise of increasing efficiency, is shameful and wrong. The act has already been stipped over the years and now you are essentially gutting it. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

27024

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The majority of the proposed changes sound like they will actually have a detrimental impact on the protection of species in Ontario, and put too much power in the hands of the Minister to supercede the advice of regulatory and advisory organizations. Lire davantage