Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53256

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposed amendment to the Planning Act to allow a Minister’s zoning order (MZO) not to have to be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), and to permit existing MZOs not to be consistent with the PPS, even though this would not apply to lands within the Greenbelt Area, is giving t Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53258

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Farmland Trust

Statut du commentaire

Ontario Farmland Trust (OFT) is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to protect and preserve Ontario farmlands and associated agricultural, natural, and cultural features of the countryside. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53259

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Nature

Statut du commentaire

Ontario Nature urges the government to remove Schedule 3 from Bill 257. Schedule 3 proposes to amend the Planning Act so that both existing and future Minister’s Zoning Orders – or MZOs - would no longer have to be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement. If passed, Schedule 3 would: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53260

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am in firm disagreement with these proposed changes as they represent a grasp for power that vastly oversteps what our provincial government should be allowed to do. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53261

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Simply stated, I believe the proposed Zoning Orders changes (aka Schedule 3) to be politically self serving with precious little regard to their environmental and social impacts.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53264

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposed changes to the Minister's zoning orders and the Planning Act are an undemocratic power grab. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53265

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposed amendment concerning Ministerial Zoning Orders (MZOs) appears to be constructed so that the concerns of Ontario citizens have no place in the Government's agenda. With no rights of appeal regarding decisions made under any MZOs we have reason to trust such decisions. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53267

Commentaire fait au nom

Greenspace Alliance of Canada's Capital

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to you on behalf of the Greenspace Alliance of Canada's Capital, a not-for profit volunteer group dedicated to protecting and preserving greenspace since 1997. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53268

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I would like to take this opportunity to provide comment on the proposed changes to Minister’s Zoning Orders and the Planning Act contained within Schedule 3 of Bill 257, Supporting Broadband and Infrastructure Expansion Act, 2021. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53271

Commentaire fait au nom

Federation of North Toronto Residents Associations

Statut du commentaire

RE: Bill 257- Schedule 3 – The Planning Act – MZOs and Provincial Policy Statements (PPS) Dear Minister Clark, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53273

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am concerned, disappointed, and angry that you have introduced legislation that amends the Planning Act to provide that Ministerial Zoning Orders (MZOs) are not required and are deemed to never have been required to be consistent with Provincial Policy Statements (PPS) issued under subsection 3 (1 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53274

Commentaire fait au nom

The South Armour Heights Residents' Association

Statut du commentaire

The members of our Residents' Association (850 households) are concerned, disappointed, and angry that you have introduced legislation that amends the Planning Act to provide that Ministerial Zoning Orders (MZOs) are not required and are deemed to never have been required to be consistent with Provi Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53288

Commentaire fait au nom

Niagara Falls Nature Club

Statut du commentaire

Please remove schedule 3 from Bill 257. Nature club members have participated in public consultations on the drafting and updating of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) over the course of many years. The PPS helps to clarify planning and any changes to it should be to make it more enforceable. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53289

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Sir, Please remember that is country is a democracy. Giving the MMAH 'the authority to zone and thereby control the use of any land in the province' smacks a bit of imperialism. We are not fooled by your stated uses of MZOs: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53291

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is one of the most outrageous and inappropriate amendments to legislation this government has proposed. The Provincial Policy Statement is in place to guide planning decisions on matters of provincial interest. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53297

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The government is proposing changes to the Planning Act so that some Minister’s zoning orders (MZOs) do not have to be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53301

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Any changes to use of the land in Ontario should be submitted to public consultation. Governments come and go. Most changes are irreversible, and will affect the quality of life in the province for many generations to come.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53305

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Schedule 3 of Bill 257 illustrates a profound disregard for environmental protection, and public consultation. Your government’s continued positive characterization of its use of MZOs as a means Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53308

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is the kind of policy that will facilitate unnecessary negative consequences for future development that is responsive to citizens'/provinces'/countries' needs. This is because it lends itself to 'misuse/misinterpretation'. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

53316

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please remove the dangerous policy changes that allow lands currently protected under the PPS tp become vulnerable to development, as the law will allow MZOs to be issued to fast-track development projects that destroy protected farmland, wetlands and natural features.