Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75497

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Removing the requirements for minimum unit size, parkland etc. will not achieve the objective of houses for everyone and will lead to many mental health issues

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75499

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Strongly disagree with the changes: as COVID has demonstrated there is a strong need for access to parkland for all.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75507

Commentaire fait au nom

The Corporation of the County of Brant

Statut du commentaire

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the changes proposed through Bill 23, and specifically Schedules 9 and 3. Attached is a report to the Council of the County of Brant that outlines preliminary comments on the proposed changes. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75815

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Many of these proposed changes in Bill 23 will lead to an urban situation that is practically un-livable. What is the point in creating housing if that housing amounts to little more than tenements? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75832

Commentaire fait au nom

Georgian Bay Association

Statut du commentaire

We are providing comments on Bill 23, More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022, and the specific EROs that are listed above. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75910

Commentaire fait au nom

Thomasfield Homes Limited

Statut du commentaire

I support the changes. Bill 23 will help the building industry do what it does best, build homes. The adjustments to the DCs will give builders the certainly they need when building new homes. Almost 1/3 of a housing cost is taxes, fees and development charges.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75946

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Hamilton Council

Statut du commentaire

The attached comments were adopted by Hamilton City Council on November 30, 2022 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76042

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The projected downloading of development fees on the municipalities and taxpayers is daunting at best!!!!! According to the AMO's submission on Bill 23, the largest communities will drop be at least $569 million per year in today's dollars. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76281

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

ERO# 019-6172 Proposed Planning Act and Development Charges Act Parkland Changes to the parkland dedication rate, which reduce the current rate of one hectare for each 300 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76299

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please do not remove housing from the development charge process! Municipalities rely on those fees to support affordable housing, and this guts their ability to provide those vital services as their communities grow. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76647

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is an OUTRAGEOUS bill. This will have huge deleterious fallouts for the environement, sustainabilty initiatives in place, and the sheer lack of oversight this will grant to developers is horrendous. This is absolutely not how Ontario should be run. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76828

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Guidelines need to be expanded to encourage active transportation links within new and expanded communities. Pedestrian routes across, under or over busy motorized routes must be included in planning for safe mobility. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76884

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This Act is just plain bad. While the act may be intended to reduce the costs of new homes, we all know that it really kjust a savings for Developers and Construction companies. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77039

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hello, I do not support this proposal for two main reasons: -The reduction of parkland. Despite the wording of the act trying to get around it, this means less guaranteed parkland. We have so little public space in our cities to begin with, why lower it further? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77256

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Schedule 3 of Bill 23 will have a long term negative impact to residents. There is no guarantee that reducing development charges imposed on the developers will reduce costs to home buyers. It's very unlikely the developers will pass all the savings to the home buyers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77727

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am a nurse practitioner who works with people facing barriers to accessing all social services. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77778

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Proposed Planning Act and Development Charges Act, 1997 Changes: I am deeply opposed to many changes in this Act as follows: 1. Provide greater cost certainty of parkland costs to enable housing developments to proceed more quickly Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77833

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the provisions in Bill 23 that: • Takes away land use planning powers from municipalities • Takes away needed development charge revenue from municipalities resulting in increased taxes for ordinary taxpayers Lire davantage