Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80859

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Ontario"s heritage is important to all who live here. Our heritage buildings and areas should be preserved and additional mechanisms enhanced. Protection of heritage buildings and areas should be enshrined and enhanced. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80864

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am opposed to this new legislation, as I fear that we will lose an important part of our heritage if it is enacted. Over the years, we have lost so much of our built heritage to make way for new construction etc. It is so important that we have these historical reminders of our past. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80867

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 23 only serves big business and big politicians. The faster homes will not be affordable, heritage homes will be knocked down, natural resources will be stripped, and towns and cities/towns will not recieve money needed to provide infrastructure and resources for the people moving in. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80895

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Don’t let red tape and NIMBYism deter you, premier Ford. I’m with you on housing.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80905

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is unclear how the proposed changes will help create more affordable or attainable housing. It is clear, however, that the changes threaten our heritage. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80908

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Premier Ford needs not to heed what the detractors and haters are saying but to proceed and build homes for the people of Ontario who elected him.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80920

Commentaire fait au nom

Greater Ottawa Home Builders' Association

Statut du commentaire

Paula Kulpa Heritage Branch Ministry of Citizenship and Multiculturalism 400 University Avenue, 5th Floor Toronto, ON M7A 2R9 Dear Ms. Kulpa, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80927

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

RE: Follow-up to Bill 23 – Proposed Changes to the Heritage Act Dear Minister Clark, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80930

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am very concerned that the government has decided it is necessary to threaten heritage protection of buildings in order to build new housing. It seems like an unnecessary and draconian wiping away of any impediment to developers putting up giant new condos. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80933

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

These changes are selling our Heritage and the understanding of our past to developers. There is no need to destroy these select properties to create more housing. This will be a shadow on the conservative party for years. It will not be forgotten. One x conservative.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80935

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

In my view the Greenbelt is an important piece of our heritage so it ought to be protected from development. Of particular concern is the parcel identified on Map 6 of the proposed amendments. It is west of Duffins Creek nearby Seaton Trail in Rouge Park. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80952

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I find it cynical in the extreme to use our urgent need for affordable housing as the vehicle by which to enrich property developers and land speculators. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80963

Commentaire fait au nom

South Shore Joint Initiative

Statut du commentaire

The South Shore Joint Initiative of Prince Edward County has cultural heritage as part of its mandate to protect the South Shore of Prince Edward County. In this capacitiy we fully support the comments of the Architectural Conservancy of Ontario reproduced here. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80969

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is another populistic measure that doesn’t have anything common with a real ‘problems solving’. So typical for modern Canada, when governments do what is easier to do, but not what can or/and will work.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80989

Commentaire fait au nom

Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals, Indigenous Heritage Circle, ICOMOS Canada, and National Trust for Canada

Statut du commentaire

On behalf of Canada’s four national heritage conservation NGOs – Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals, Indigenous Heritage Circle, ICOMOS Canada, and National Trust for Canada – we would like to express our grave concerns about the potentially devastating impacts the proposed changes to th Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81003

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Today, people travel the world to see major heritage buildings and landscapes. People travel locally, to historic district for a variety of shopping, service and entertainment reasons. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81005

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I have read the proposal, and I am dismayed at the regressive nature of this effort to impact and reduce the efficacy of Ontario's highly regarded and effective heritage legislation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81012

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

In general, this proposal to changes to the OHA is confusing and convoluted. If this truly applies to provincially owned and culturally significant buildings, then the MCM would be the ultimate decision-maker. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81020

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

RE: The proposed introduction of enabling legislative authority that provides that the process for identifying provincial heritage properties under the S&Gs may permit the Minister of Citizenship and Multiculturalism to review, confirm and revise, the determination of cultural heritage value or inte Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81022

Commentaire fait au nom

Township of Puslinch

Statut du commentaire

Whereas Puslinch Council remains significantly concerned with the legislative changes in Bill 23, in addition to comments previously submitted by Puslinch Council, Council resolved as follows; Puslinch Council submits the following additional formal comments: Lire davantage