Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69212

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Do you really think the solution to an AFFORDABILITY crisis is to spend more money on housing construction in a protected land area? What is the point of the Greenbelt's conservation boundaries if they are subject to change as soon as it is inconvenient for developers? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69243

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We need more housing, but not at the expense of destroying protected land. Why does this even need to be said? This land is supposed to be PERMANENTLY protected. Creating amendments to this just opens the door to destroying other important parts of the environment. There are other solutions. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69261

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As an Ontario resident, I would be far more supportive of an initiative to repurpose existing urban and suburban spaces for housing than this plan to remove a significant part of the Ontario Greenbelt. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69333

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Farmland Trust

Statut du commentaire

The Ontario Farmland Trust does not support the proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69572

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Unequivocally do not allow any development of the Greenbelt. None. Figure something else out for housing (which is obviously a challenge and a real problem in our province), and keep election promises to not touch the Greenbelt. Don’t do it. We are watching and ready to vote out this government.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69578

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The title of Bill 23 - "More Homes Built Faster" is an interesting attempt to distract the public from the real intent of the legislation, that being to make it easier for developers to encroach on protected lands for development. Yes, we are in need of more homes for people to live in. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69592

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hello, I agree with this since the province needs to allow for housing, highways and other infrastructure to remain competitive in the future.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69598

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I support these changes because the changes are providing a solid foundation to address Ontario’s housing supply crisis over the long term. We have lots of green space in other areas of Ontario — why create a greenbelt where houses and highways need to be built? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69603

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There should absolutely be no lifting of any environmental protections in the Greenbelt, or anywhere else for that matter. Protecting our wetlands and natural environment should be of the highest priority at this critical juncture in the climate change crisis. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69609

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We should not be reducing our greenbelt. We knew Ford would try this underhanded wheeling and dealing to obliterate the best parts of Ontario

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69651

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am completely against it. Doug Ford is running this province into the ground, and does not need to develop houses on the Greenbelt. This area is supposed to be protected and untouched. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69653

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The greenbelt was created to preserve the farmlands and nature that was at risk of being destroyed by unending sprawling development. By removing pieces of the greenbelt, the provincial government dooms these farmland and nature that we had hoped would be protected forever. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69654

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is a terrible idea - please don't do this. As much as we need more housing, the Greenbelt is protected for a reason.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69679

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please stop the Bill. It’s not going to ease the existing housing crisis, but permanently destroy the green belt and all lives around. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69784

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

If we lose the green belt we lose biodiversity and many species that are unique to this area. If we don't have enough wetlands, trees, proper biodiversity and healthy ecosystems we are more prone to flooding which impacts houses, insurance rates, etc. The greenbelt is: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69794

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I oppose Bill 23, the Greenbelt should be protected as promised by Premier Ford. The natural environment, animal habitats and farmland should not be sacrificed and destroyed for urban sprawl.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69796

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As currently written, this amendment would be a disaster for Ontario. As the climate crisis worsens, wetlands are essential to stave off expensive floods, and farmland is increasingly valuable - yet this amendment would decimate both. Lire davantage