Comment
This bill is preposterous, we can't have the province deciding on bike lanes in the city. I'm both an avid driver and a cyclist in Toronto, the bike lanes have been a Godsend to me getting around faster, more affordably, and it has had substantial improvements to my physical and mental health. I use it to travel to work multiple days a week in all seasons, as well as around the city. If anything, this takes me away from using my car and adding to the traffic and congestion.
I am very much against this proposal, for the following reasons:
- Local control is essential: City planning decisions, like bike lane placement, should be made by Toronto's local government, which understands the unique needs and challenges of its streets.
- Undermines local democracy: Removing authority from Toronto City Council disempowers elected officials accountable to residents, reducing public input and transparency.
- One-size-fits-all doesn't work: Provincial oversight risks blanket policies that may not suit Toronto's complex, congested roadways, resulting in inefficiencies and poor outcomes.
- Stifles progress: Toronto has made significant strides in active transportation planning. Provincial interference could slow these efforts, leading to delays in crucial bike-friendly infrastructure.
- Local priorities matter: Toronto’s vision for its streets—balancing cars, bikes, and pedestrians—may clash with provincial goals that prioritize reducing gridlock at the expense of cyclist safety and environmental benefits.
Submitted October 23, 2024 10:22 PM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
103848
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status