Commentaire
This bill is preposterous, we can't have the province deciding on bike lanes in the city. I'm both an avid driver and a cyclist in Toronto, the bike lanes have been a Godsend to me getting around faster, more affordably, and it has had substantial improvements to my physical and mental health. I use it to travel to work multiple days a week in all seasons, as well as around the city. If anything, this takes me away from using my car and adding to the traffic and congestion.
I am very much against this proposal, for the following reasons:
- Local control is essential: City planning decisions, like bike lane placement, should be made by Toronto's local government, which understands the unique needs and challenges of its streets.
- Undermines local democracy: Removing authority from Toronto City Council disempowers elected officials accountable to residents, reducing public input and transparency.
- One-size-fits-all doesn't work: Provincial oversight risks blanket policies that may not suit Toronto's complex, congested roadways, resulting in inefficiencies and poor outcomes.
- Stifles progress: Toronto has made significant strides in active transportation planning. Provincial interference could slow these efforts, leading to delays in crucial bike-friendly infrastructure.
- Local priorities matter: Toronto’s vision for its streets—balancing cars, bikes, and pedestrians—may clash with provincial goals that prioritize reducing gridlock at the expense of cyclist safety and environmental benefits.
Soumis le 23 octobre 2024 10:22 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
103848
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire