Comment
As a Toronto cyclist, I strongly oppose Bill 212. This proposed legislation could undermine years of progress in making our streets safer for cyclists. Bike lanes are essential for encouraging more sustainable transportation options, reducing traffic congestion, and improving public health. By potentially reducing the number of dedicated bike lanes or making them less safe, this bill puts cyclists at risk and discourages people from cycling altogether. Cycling infrastructure should be prioritized, not undermined. This proposed legislation is not only a step backwards in terms of bike safety, but it also makes no sense financially. We’ve already invested so much taxpayer money into creating and maintaining bike lanes across the city. Ripping out existing infrastructure would be a massive waste of those resources, all for the sake of reversing progress that has taken years to achieve. Instead of dismantling what we've built, we should be looking for ways to improve and expand it. Removing bike lanes that have already been paid for doesn’t just hurt cyclists—it’s a poor use of public funds and a missed opportunity to build a more sustainable, safer, and accessible city for everyone.
Submitted November 13, 2024 9:14 AM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
115233
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status