Commentaire
As a Toronto cyclist, I strongly oppose Bill 212. This proposed legislation could undermine years of progress in making our streets safer for cyclists. Bike lanes are essential for encouraging more sustainable transportation options, reducing traffic congestion, and improving public health. By potentially reducing the number of dedicated bike lanes or making them less safe, this bill puts cyclists at risk and discourages people from cycling altogether. Cycling infrastructure should be prioritized, not undermined. This proposed legislation is not only a step backwards in terms of bike safety, but it also makes no sense financially. We’ve already invested so much taxpayer money into creating and maintaining bike lanes across the city. Ripping out existing infrastructure would be a massive waste of those resources, all for the sake of reversing progress that has taken years to achieve. Instead of dismantling what we've built, we should be looking for ways to improve and expand it. Removing bike lanes that have already been paid for doesn’t just hurt cyclists—it’s a poor use of public funds and a missed opportunity to build a more sustainable, safer, and accessible city for everyone.
Soumis le 13 novembre 2024 9:14 AM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
115233
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire