I am writing to express my…

ERO number

019-9266

Comment ID

116213

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses

Comment

I am writing to express my strong opposition to Bill 212, the “Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024,” particularly concerning its provisions to remove existing bike lanes on major Toronto streets such as Bloor Street, Yonge Street, and University Avenue. This legislation poses significant risks to public safety, undermines local governance, and disregards the proven benefits of cycling infrastructure.

Impact on Public Safety:

The removal of established bike lanes endangers cyclists by forcing them to share lanes with motor vehicles, increasing the likelihood of accidents and injuries. Studies have consistently shown that dedicated cycling infrastructure reduces collisions and enhances safety for all road users. For instance, research indicates that bike lanes delineated with bollards or traffic cones are most likely to slow drivers and reduce crashes between cars and bikes.

Economic and Environmental Considerations:

Eliminating bike lanes may lead to increased traffic congestion and higher emissions, as more individuals might resort to car travel due to perceived safety concerns. This shift contradicts efforts to promote sustainable transportation and combat climate change. Moreover, the financial burden of removing existing infrastructure is substantial. A recent city staff report estimates that removing bike lanes in Toronto will cost at least $48 million, a significant expenditure that could be allocated to more pressing community needs.

Undermining Local Governance:

Bill 212 represents an overreach of provincial authority into municipal affairs. Local governments possess the contextual understanding necessary to make informed decisions about transportation infrastructure that best serves their communities. By imposing top-down mandates, the bill disregards the principles of local democracy and the autonomy of municipalities to address their unique transportation challenges.

Conclusion:

In light of these concerns, I urge the provincial government to reconsider the provisions of Bill 212 related to the removal of bike lanes. Maintaining and expanding cycling infrastructure is essential for fostering a safe, sustainable, and economically vibrant urban environment. Collaborative efforts between provincial and municipal authorities are crucial to developing transportation policies that reflect the needs and aspirations of all residents.