The proposed framework is a…

The proposed framework is a backwards approach to transportation. We need diverse modes of transportation if we’re going to address our greenhouse gas emissions. Many people don’t feel safe without bike lanes (for good reason), so preventing new lanes will stop those people from cycling. Other people will continue to cycle, and they will slow down traffic in the left most lane in the absence of a bike lane! I feel much safer on roads with bike lanes both as a cyclist and a driver.

In addition to the environmental aspect, cycling is a good way for people to be more physically active and connected to their communities. When I commute by car it’s an isolating experience and I have very little interactions - I leave my house and stay in my car until I’m at work. I don’t see much of interest because I need to focus on driving. When I commute by bike, I see my community in greater depth and often interact with people along the way. I also arrive at work feeling energized and happy. More people should have the opportunity to experience this, but most will not if they don’t feel safe on the road.

Removing the existing Toronto bike lanes is a massive waste of our money. The construction would also have a big impact on traffic, which is counterproductive.

On top of all this, the decision to install bike lanes (or not) is a municipal matter. The provincial government overriding municipalities decisions is totally inappropriate. The municipality knows its local transportation needs far better than the province. It’s unprofessional behaviour from our Premier to be interfering. If he would like to work in municipal politics he is welcome to run for office. It’s embarrassing.