I strongly disagree with…

I strongly disagree with this amalgamation. History has proved larger "regions" are more expensive and less responsive to citizen concerns. In this case it is dangerous.

The Upper Thames River Conservation Authority is one of 36 Conservation Authorities in the Province of Ontario, Canada. Our area of jurisdiction, the upper watershed of
the Thames River,covers 3,430 square kilometres in southwestern Ontario and is home to approximately 593,700 people. The Thames is a Canadian Heritage River.

• Reduce the Size of the Proposed Region – The proposed Lake Erie Regional Conservation Authority — covering 8 conservation authorities and 81 municipalities —
is much too large to remain responsive and effective. The Province should consider smaller, more focused regional models that improve efficiency while preserving local
knowledge and relationships.

• The UTRCA was created in 1947 as a partnership between member municipalities to use local knowledge and expertise to make decisions regarding the management of the
watershed’s natural resources. The 17 watershed municipalities appoint a board of 15 members who determine the programs and services the UTRCA provides to watershed communities.
A single board representing 81 municipalities will dilute local voices. The governance model must ensure meaningful local representation that balances rural and urban priorities and
interests, so watershed priorities remain community driven.

• Local conservation staff and offices understand the water, land, people, and challenges of the Upper Thames River watershed in ways centralized decision-makers cannot.
Decisions made from afar will not reflect the area’s unique environmental, agricultural, and community needs. Local expertise is essential for public safety, environmental protection,
and the delivery of effective community services.

• Protect Existing Programs and Services – The UTRCA delivers programs that directly support the unique requests and needs of watershed landowners, municipalities, and communities.
Our residents value our species-at-risk initiatives (turtles and fish), environmental education for students, specialized technical advice, and outdoor recreation—but these are just
some of the programs that may be lost under a centralized, standardized regional model. These locally developed services must be protected.
A regional model may lead to reduced service levels, loss of expertise, or diminished community access for local residents.

• Support Efficient Planning and Permitting – UTRCA provides timely responses and approvals that meet or exceed provincial timelines. In 2024, 99% of permit applications were
completed within the provincial guidelines. Regionalizing permitting must not create delays, bottlenecks, or reduced access to technical expertise.

• A regional funding model must be fair to rural municipalities and avoid cost shifts that disadvantage small communities. Member municipalities contribute 34% of the UTRCA’s
operating budget through levies and cost-sharing agreements, 34% is self-generated through user fees and donations, and 30% is obtained through applications to foundations and
other levels of government to leverage municipal contributions and provide more robust programs to watershed residents. The provincial contributions represent just 2% of the UTRCA’s operating budget.