Commentaire
Dear members,
I oppose Bill 212 as it fails to adequately address the needs of our communities and the importance of inclusive transportation options. While promoting active transportation is vital for reducing congestion and improving public health, the bill lacks comprehensive planning and investment in safe infrastructure.
Research shows that increased investment in active transportation leads to significant health benefits. A study published in Preventive Medicine found that communities with well-designed biking and walking infrastructure saw a marked decrease in obesity rates and related health issues. Additionally, the Journal of Transport & Health reports that active transportation can reduce air pollution and improve mental health outcomes.
Moreover, studies indicate that enhancing active transportation options can significantly reduce gridlock. For instance, a report from the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy found that cities that invested in bike lanes and pedestrian-friendly infrastructure experienced a measurable decrease in traffic congestion. Another study in Transport Policy demonstrated that integrating cycling and walking into public transit systems can reduce overall vehicle trips, leading to less congestion on roads.
However, without dedicated bike lanes, pedestrian pathways, and proper funding for public transit, we risk sidelining vulnerable populations who rely on these modes of transportation. Instead of merely promoting active transport, we need a holistic approach that ensures accessibility, safety, and equity for all residents.
I urge lawmakers to reconsider the bill and prioritize a truly integrated transportation strategy that supports all members of our community.
Thank you.
A Torontonian
Soumis le 22 octobre 2024 12:07 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
101796
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire