Commentaire
My experience and the vast majority of available data leads me to urge you to reconsider the proposed legislation. Requiring municipalities to seek provincial approval for transportation infrastructure undermines the principle of subsidiarity, which emphasizes that decisions should be made at the most local level possible. Local municipalities, not the province, are in the best position to understand and meet the specific transportation needs of their communities.
Numerous studies have shown that encouraging active transportation options like cycling and walking, coupled with strong public transit, is the most effective way to reduce congestion. In fact, research consistently highlights that cities with robust bike infrastructure experience not only less traffic congestion but also improvements in public safety and local economic vitality.
A prominent Canadian urban planner has said that “building more roads just leads to more traffic.” In contrast, cities that prioritize cycling and walking infrastructure see a meaningful shift toward sustainable transportation choices that benefit everyone.
As we face increasing challenges from climate change, prioritizing bike lanes and alternative transport options will be key to fostering healthier and more livable cities, while also addressing traffic and environmental concerns.
Instead of restricting municipalities’ ability to design streets that work for everyone, the province should support efforts to make cycling safer and more attractive, which ultimately reduces car traffic and congestion.
Thank you for considering this input.
Soumis le 23 octobre 2024 8:09 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
103632
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire