Commentaire
I find it extremely counter-productive that the province would go so far as to remove efficient forms on transit in favour of inefficient ones. Instead of making our roads safer, all this will do is cause more accidents, increase our CO2 output, and remove healthy forms of transportations.
Why isn't the province focused on ensuring that transit under their purview (Metrolinx) actually complete their projects? That would actually help grid lock. Why isn't the province focused on actually building mass transit in the areas we know the province appears to be obsessed about?
Why does the city of Toronto not have funding necessary to properly serve the people in the East? Why is the province not considering working with their jurisdictions on solutions instead of overriding them?
The province’s incoming approach to transit policy is not only short-sighted but dangerous. It creates traffic congestion, increases accidents, and hinders efforts to fight climate change. The focus should be on building and improving mass transit, particularly in underserved areas, and completing long-overdue projects that have the potential to actually move people, not cars.
Soumis le 24 octobre 2024 4:39 AM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
104042
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire